Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16235351›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2005

Antihypertensive agents for preventing diabetic kidney disease.

G F M Strippoli, M Craig, J C Craig

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Antihypertensive agents for preventing diabetic kidney disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  6. Pentoxifylline for diabetic kidney disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Diabetic nephropathy.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2012
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Cardio classics revisited--focus on the role of candesartan.Vascular health and risk management · 2010
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Management of type 2 diabetes: NICE guidelines.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

G F M StrippoliNHMRC Centre for Clinical Research Excellence in Renal Medicine, Cochrane Renal Group, Centre for Kidney Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Locked Bag 4001, Westmead, NSW, Australia 2145. gfmstrippoli@aliceposta.it
M Craig
J C Craig
George Institute for Global Health · GBMario Negri Sud Foundation · ITUniversity of Sydney · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTwenty to sixty percent of diabetic patients are affected by hypertension and antihypertensive agents are used to treat this condition. These agents are also used to prevent the onset of kidney disease both in normotensive and hypertensive diabetics.

objectivesTo evaluate the comparative effects of antihypertensive agents in patients with diabetes and normoalbuminuria. SEARCH STRATEGY: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, conference proceedings, and contact with investigators were used to identify relevant trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any antihypertensive agent with placebo or another agent in hypertensive or normotensive patients with diabetes and no kidney disease (albumin excretion rate < 30 mg/d) were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two investigators independently extracted data on renal outcomes and other patient relevant outcomes (all-cause mortality, serious cardiovascular events), and assessed quality of trials. Analysis was by a random effects model and results expressed as relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). MAIN

resultsSixteen trials (7603 patients) were identified, six of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) versus placebo, six of ACEi versus calcium channel blockers (CCBs), one of ACEi versus CCBs or combined ACEi and CCBs and three of ACEi versus other agents. Compared to placebo, ACEi significantly reduced the development of microalbuminuria (six trials, 3840 patients: RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.84) but not doubling of creatinine (three trials, 2683 patients: RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.24 to 2.71) or all-cause mortality (four trials, 3284 patients: RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.03). Compared to CCBs, ACEi significantly reduced progression to microalbuminuria (four trials, 1210 patients: RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.84). AUTHORS'

conclusionsA significant reduction in the risk of developing microalbuminuria in normoalbuminuric patients with diabetes has been demonstrated for ACEi only. It appears that the effect of ACEi is independent of baseline blood pressure, renal function and type of diabetes, but data is too sparse to be confident that these are not important effect modifiers and an individual patient data meta-analysis is required.

Indexed as

AlbuminuriaAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAntihypertensive AgentsCalcium Channel BlockersDiabetic NephropathiesHumansHypertensionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAntihypertensive AgentsCalcium Channel Blockers

Identifiers

PMID16235351
OpenAlexW4251386432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.