Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16235346›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2005

Chemotherapy for advanced, recurrent or metastatic endometrial carcinoma.

C Humber, J Tierney, P Symonds, M Collingwood, J Kirwan, C Williams, J Green

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Chemotherapy for advanced, recurrent or metastatic endometrial carcinoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  2. Hormonal therapy in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C HumberWalsgrave Hospital, Department of Oncology, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry, UK CV2 2DX. cehumber@doctors.org.uk
J Tierney
P Symonds
M Collingwood
J Kirwan
C Williams
J Green
University Hospital Coventry · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndometrial adenocarcinoma is a common gynaecological cancer, but a comparatively small proportion of patients present with or develop recurrent or advanced disease. Progestogens are widely used, with little evidence of their efficacy. Co-morbidity including obesity and cardiac disease and concerns over toxicity have prevented more extensive studies of cytotoxic chemotherapy, although there are a number of active agents.

objectivesTo assess any benefits or adverse effects of cytotoxic chemotherapy in women with advanced, recurrent or metastatic endometrial adenocarcinoma. SEARCH STRATEGY: The major medical literature databases were searched for all known randomised controlled trials (RCTs), as were trials registers and reference lists of relevant publications. SELECTION CRITERIA: RCTs comparing chemotherapy versus another intervention (including different chemotherapy) in advanced disease were considered. Trials of adjuvant treatment or for sarcomatous tumours were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted from the papers by reviewers and authors of included studies contacted for further information. MAIN

resultsEleven eligible trials were identified which entered 2288 patients between 1974 and 2000. A meta-analysis of the 6 trials comparing more with less chemotherapy with combination was possible and included 1135 patients. Progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly improved (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.80, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.71 to 0.90, p = 0.004), but there was only a trend toward improved survival (HR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.03). Toxicity was in general higher with the combination chemotherapy regimens. Only one trial showed a significant survival benefit from the addition of paclitaxel to combination chemotherapy, but this was at the expense of increased toxicity. There was insufficient evidence to assess whether there was any benefit from cytotoxic chemotherapy in terms of symptom control or QOL compared with best supportive care. There were no comparative trials of chemotherapy with endocrine therapy. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThe optimum cytotoxic drug regimen for advanced endometrial adenocarcinoma has still to be defined although our review suggests that it may contain paclitaxel or platinum. These mainly North American and European trial populations represent a highly selected subgroup of the 10,000 women dying annually from this disease. Future trials should include measures of QOL and symptom control in addition to PFS and overall survival (OS). They should also consider comparison of endocrine therapy and cytotoxic chemotherapy in patients with no prior drug therapy. Stratification of patients should take into account other prognostic factors including co-morbidity and prior radiation treatment.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID16235346
OpenAlexW4235747091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.