SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2005
Traction for low-back pain with or without sciatica.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Low-value interventions to deimplement: A secondary analysis of a systematic review of low back pain clinical practice guidelines.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2025Pooled it
- Assessment of variability in traction interventions for patients with low back pain: a systematic review.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2018Pooled it
- Traction for low-back pain with or without sciatica.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Functional Changes in Patients and Morphological Changes in the Lumbar Intervertebral Disc after Applying Lordotic Curve-Controlled Traction: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2019Trial
- Restoration of disk height through non-surgical spinal decompression is associated with decreased discogenic low back pain: a retrospective cohort study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2010Trial
- The effects of weightbath traction hydrotherapy as a component of complex physical therapy in disorders of the cervical and lumbar spine: a controlled pilot study with follow-up.Rheumatology international · 2008Trial
- The effectiveness of motorised lumbar traction in the management of LBP with lumbo sacral nerve root involvement: a feasibility study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2007Trial
- Traction Therapy for Cervical Radicular Syndrome is Statistically Significant but not Clinically Relevant for Pain Relief. A Systematic Literature Review with Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- Short-term results after local application of steroids and anesthetics in patients with painful spine conditions.Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2014Article
- Article
- Management of radicular pain in rheumatic disease: insight for the physician.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2012Article
- Epidural steroid injection in patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy in Abuja, Nigeria.Journal of neurosciences in rural practice · 2012Article
- A clinical prediction rule for classifying patients with low back pain who demonstrate short-term improvement with mechanical lumbar traction.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2009Article
- Use of complementary alternative medicine for low back pain consulting in general practice: a cohort study.BMC complementary and alternative medicine · 2007Article
- Stress in lumbar intervertebral discs during distraction: a cadaveric study.The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVarious types of traction are used in the treatment of low-back pain (LBP), often in conjunction with other treatments.
objectivesTo determine the effectiveness of traction in the management of LBP. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched The Cochrane Library 2004, Issue 4, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL to November 2004, references in relevant reviews, and our personal files. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining any type of traction for the treatment of acute (less than four weeks duration), sub-acute (four to 12 weeks) or chronic (more than 12 weeks) non-specific LBP with or without sciatica. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Study selection, methodological quality assessment and data extraction were done independently by sets of two reviewers. As available studies did not provide sufficient data for statistical pooling, a qualitative analysis was performed. MAIN
resultsTwenty-four RCTs, involving 2177 patients (1016 receiving traction) were included in the review. Five trials were considered high quality. There is strong evidence that there is no significant difference in short or long-term outcomes between either continuous or intermittent traction and placebo, sham, or other treatments for patients with a mixed duration of LBP, with or without sciatica. There is moderate evidence that: autotraction is more effective other forms of traction are no more effective than placebo, sham or no treatment for patients with a mixed duration of LBP with sciatica. There is limited evidence that: there is no significant difference in outcomes between a standard physical therapy program with continuous traction and the same program without traction, for patients with a mixed duration of LBP, with or without sciatica autotraction on its own is more effective than a physical therapy program that includes Tru-Trac traction for patients with a mixed duration of LBP with sciatica. There is conflicting evidence regarding the short-term effectiveness of either continuous or intermittent traction compared to placebo, sham or other treatments, in the management of patients who have either chronic LBP or a mixed duration of LBP with sciatica. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThe evidence suggests that traction is probably not effective. Neither continuous nor intermittent traction by itself was more effective in improving pain, disability or work absence than placebo, sham or other treatments for patients with a mixed duration of LBP, with or without sciatica. Although trials studying patients with sciatica had methodological limitations and inconsistent results, there was moderate evidence that autotraction was more effective than mechanical traction for global improvement in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.