SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2005
Mitoxantrone for multiple sclerosis.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Corticosteroids for the long-term treatment in multiple sclerosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2008Pooled it
- Intravenous immunoglobulins for multiple sclerosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2003Pooled it
- Trial
- Ubiquitin specific peptidase 11 as a novel therapeutic target for cancer management.Cell death discovery · 2022Review
- Treatment of progressive multiple sclerosis with high-dose all-trans retinoic acid - no clear evidence of positive disease modifying effects.Neurological research and practice · 2021Article
- The Role of Distinct Subsets of Macrophages in the Pathogenesis of MS and the Impact of Different Therapeutic Agents on These Populations.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- Drug therapy for multiple sclerosis.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2014Review
- New and emerging immune-targeted drugs for the treatment of multiple sclerosis.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2014Review
- Compliance to fingolimod and other disease modifying treatments in multiple sclerosis patients, a retrospective cohort study.BMC neurology · 2013Article
- Glatiramer acetate in treatment of multiple sclerosis: a toolbox of random co-polymers for targeting inflammatory mechanisms of both the innate and adaptive immune system?International journal of molecular sciences · 2012Review
- Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) as a model for multiple sclerosis (MS).British journal of pharmacology · 2011Review
- Treatment of multiple sclerosis: current concepts and future perspectives.Journal of neurology · 2011Review
- Multiple sclerosis: pathogenesis and treatment.Current neuropharmacology · 2011Article
- Repeated intrathecal triamcinolone acetonide administration in progressive multiple sclerosis: a review.Multiple sclerosis international · 2011Article
- T-cell based immunotherapy in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis.Immunotherapy · 2010Review
- Mitoxantrone: benefits and risks in multiple sclerosis patients.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2009Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMitoxantrone (MX) has been shown to be moderately effective in reducing the clinical outcome measures of disease activity in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients.
objectivesThe objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of MX in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), progressive relapsing MS (PRMS) and secondary progressive MS (SPMS). SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane MS Group Trials Register (searched April 2005), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2004), MEDLINE (Pub Med) (January 1966 to April 2005), EMBASE (January 1974 to April 2005), and reference lists of articles. We also undertook hand searching and contacting trialists and pharmaceutical companies. SELECTION CRITERIA: The trials were selected if double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomised, irrespective of eventual additive therapy (such as steroids). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three reviewers independently selected articles for inclusion, assessed trials' quality and extracted data. MAIN
resultsFour trials involving 270 participants were included. MX was found to reduce the progression of disability at 2 years follow-up (proportion of participants with 6-months confirmed progression of disability: Odds Ratios (OR) 0.3, p = 0.05). Similar figures were found regarding the reduction in annualised relapse rate and the proportion of patients free from relapses at 1 and 2 years, as well as the number of patients with active MRI lesions at 6 months/ 1 year only. Side effects reported in the trials were more frequent in treated patients than in controls. Caution must be exercised in drawing conclusions from such data because of the heterogeneous quality and characteristics of the included trials, which are different in terms of treatment schedule and type of enrolled patients. More than half of the included patients came from a single study. Moreover, from the included trials, it was not possible to estimate the long-term efficacy and safety of MX, which may raise concerns about the risk of cardiotoxicity and therapy-related leukemias, which is increasingly reported in the literature. AUTHORS'
conclusionsMX is moderately effective in reducing the disease progression and the frequency of relapses in patients affected by RR, PR and SP MS in the short-term follow-up (2 years), even if the results are based on trials heterogeneous in terms of drug dosage and inclusion criteria. No major neoplastic or symptomatic cardiotoxicity related to MX have been reported from the trials. However, longer follow-up studies are highly warranted to better explore the efficacy and safety of the drug, mainly as regards the long-term risk of therapy-related leukemias and cardiotoxicity. As a conclusion, MX has a partial efficacy, but, due to its unclear long-term safety profile, it should be used to treat patients with worsening RR and SP MS with evidence of worsening disability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.