Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16235120›Full record

ArticleChromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology2005

Multi-alignment of orthologous genome regions in five species provides new insights into the evolutionary make-up of mammalian genomes.

Zhihua Jiang, Jennifer J Michal, Jenna S Melville, Heather L Baltzer

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhihua JiangDepartment of Animal Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA. jiangz@wsu.edu
Jennifer J Michal
Jenna S Melville
Heather L Baltzer
University of Guelph · CAWashington State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence has shown that bacterial genomes have undergone random shuffling of genomic elements consisting of one to two genes. In order to delineate such genome-shuffling events in mammals, we constructed a high-resolution map of Sus scrofa chromosome 3 (SSC3) with a total of 116 genes/markers. Alignment of this pig map to orthologous regions in human, dog, mouse and rat led to the identification of 31 provisional conserved ancestral blocks (CABs) in these five species. Among them, only 3 CABs (<10%) had one gene, indicating that one-gene shuffling is not frequent in mammals. The sizes of CABs vary significantly within a species, but each may be relatively consistent in different species with a scale to species-genome evolution. The type and frequency of rearrangement events that takes place, either intra- or interchromosomal, depends on the evolutionary regions and species under comparison. Characterization of 36 tentative breakpoint regions flanking these 31 CABs indicated that they occupied approximately 43 Mb in length and featured genome deserts, gene duplications, and birth/death of species-specific genes in humans. Identification of CABs provides an alternative for further determination of the evolutionary make-up of mammalian genomes.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenomeAnimalsChromosome BreakageChromosomes, MammalianConserved SequenceDogsGene DuplicationGene OrderGenomicsHumansMammalsMiceRadiation Hybrid MappingRatsSequence Alignment

Identifiers

PMID16235120
OpenAlexW2071056767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.