ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2005
[Calcium oxalate stones and hyperoxaluria. What is certain? What is new?].
Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Urolithiasis in childhood].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2013Review
- [Evidence-based pharmacological metaphylaxis of stone disease].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2006Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Approximately 4 million Germans suffer from stone disease. In the majority of cases (70-75%) it is calcium oxalate. Its pathophysiology is complex and comprises disorders such as hypercalciuria, hyperoxaluria, hypocitraturia, hyperuricosuria, and hypomagnesuria. These biochemical changes in urine are well known as "classic" risk factors of calcium oxalate stone formation. However, studies in the last decade showed that calcium oxalate stones are strongly related with other diseases or disorders such as overweight, hypertension, or a lack of oxalate-degrading bacteria in the gut. The evidence for these "new" risk factors in the literature is very strong. It is particularly important in regard to effective treatment and aftercare of patients with calcium oxalate stones to be familiar with both the "classic" and the new risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.