Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16231973›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2005

Modeling T cell antigen discrimination based on feedback control of digital ERK responses.

Grégoire Altan-Bonnet, Ronald N Germain

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 287 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
287citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

287 citing papers in PubMed, 485 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. T cell receptor specificity landscape revealed through de novo peptide design.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  16. Parallel reactions on a single T cell receptor offer a robust kinetic proofreading mechanism.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

227 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Grégoire Altan-BonnetLymphocyte Biology Section, Laboratory of Immunology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Ronald N Germain
National Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Analysis Of T Cell Receptor Structure And FunctionZIAAI000403 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI GERMAIN, RONALD N · 2009 to 2015
$2.5M
MOLECULAR GENETIC ANALYSIS OF T CELL RECEPTOR STRUCTURE AND REPERTOIREZ01AI000403 · NIAID · NIAID EXTRAMURAL ACTIVITIES · PI GERMAIN, RONALD N · 1985 to 2008
$684k
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

T-lymphocyte activation displays a remarkable combination of speed, sensitivity, and discrimination in response to peptide-major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) ligand engagement of clonally distributed antigen receptors (T cell receptors or TCRs). Even a few foreign pMHCs on the surface of an antigen-presenting cell trigger effective signaling within seconds, whereas 1 x 10(5)-1 x 10(6) self-pMHC ligands that may differ from the foreign stimulus by only a single amino acid fail to elicit this response. No existing model accounts for this nearly absolute distinction between closely related TCR ligands while also preserving the other canonical features of T-cell responses. Here we document the unexpected highly amplified and digital nature of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) activation in T cells. Based on this observation and evidence that competing positive- and negative-feedback loops contribute to TCR ligand discrimination, we constructed a new mathematical model of proximal TCR-dependent signaling. The model made clear that competition between a digital positive feedback based on ERK activity and an analog negative feedback involving SH2 domain-containing tyrosine phosphatase (SHP-1) was critical for defining a sharp ligand-discrimination threshold while preserving a rapid and sensitive response. Several nontrivial predictions of this model, including the notion that this threshold is highly sensitive to small changes in SHP-1 expression levels during cellular differentiation, were confirmed by experiment. These results combining computation and experiment reveal that ligand discrimination by T cells is controlled by the dynamics of competing feedback loops that regulate a high-gain digital amplifier, which is itself modulated during differentiation by alterations in the intracellular concentrations of key enzymes. The organization of the signaling network that we model here may be a prototypic solution to the problem of achieving ligand selectivity, low noise, and high sensitivity in biological responses.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigen-Presenting CellsAntigensAntigens, Differentiation, T-LymphocyteCalibrationCell DifferentiationCell MembraneCluster AnalysisComputer SimulationCytoplasmExtracellular Signal-Regulated MAP KinasesFeedback, PhysiologicalFlow CytometryGene Expression RegulationIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsKineticsAntigensAntigens, Differentiation, T-LymphocyteExtracellular Signal-Regulated MAP KinasesIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsLigandsPeptidesProtein Tyrosine Phosphatase, Non-Receptor Type 6Protein Tyrosine PhosphatasesPtpn6 protein, mouseReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell

Identifiers

PMID16231973
PMCPMC1262625
OpenAlexW2063116057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.