Trial reportPLoS medicine2005
Randomized, controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: the ANRS 1265 Trial.
Trial report in PLoS medicine, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 8 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1,063 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of Safe Male Circumcision on Incidence of Infection by HIV, HSV-2 and of Genital Ulceration
Shang Ring Versus Forceps-guided Adult Male Circumcision: a Randomized Controlled Effectiveness Study in Southwestern Uganda.
Evaluation of the AccuCirc for Early Infant Male Circumcision in Nyanza, Kenya
A Pilot Study to Introduce Male Circumcision (MC) Services to Prevent HIV Infection in Two High Prevalence Areas of the Dominican Republic (DR)
Male Circumcision for HIV Prevention in Kenya: Seeking Effective Strategies to Recruit Older Men
Evaluation of the ShangRing vs. Mogen Clamp for Early Infant Male Circumcision (EIMC) in Sub-Saharan Africa
Testing the Ability of a Microbiome - Focused Intervention to Reduce HIV Susceptibility in Ugandan Men
Evaluation of the Acceptability and Safety of the ShangRing Device for Male Circumcision in Shinyanga, Tanzania
Who cites it
1,063 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 2,445 citations in OpenAlex.
- Circumcision for HIV Prevention in Men Who Have Sex With Men: An Updated Meta-Analysis.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2026Pooled it
- Male Circumcision and HIV Risk Compensation Among Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.AIDS and behavior · 2026Pooled it
- Traditional male circumcision and the risk for HIV transmission among men: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2023Pooled it
- Systematic review: Safety of surgical male circumcision in context of HIV prevention public health programmes.Gates open research · 2022Pooled it
- Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2021Guideline
- Association between medical male circumcision and HIV risk compensation among heterosexual men: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Lancet. Global health · 2021Pooled it
- Circumcision devices versus standard surgical techniques in adolescent and adult male circumcisions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Impact of male circumcision on risk of HIV infection in men in a changing epidemic context - systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2020Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Service delivery interventions to increase uptake of voluntary medical male circumcision for HIV prevention: A systematic review.PloS one · 2020Pooled it
- Critical evaluation of arguments opposing male circumcision: A systematic review.Journal of evidence-based medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Cost comparison of the ShangRing device versus Mogen clamp for early infant male circumcision in Sub-Saharan Africa.PloS one · 2026Trial
- Safety and efficacy of the ShangRing for early infant male circumcision in the routine clinical setting.BMJ global health · 2025Trial
- Comparison of the penile microbiome in infant male circumcision: Mogen clamp versus Shangring.EBioMedicine · 2024Trial
- Gene expression of tight junctions in foreskin is not affected by HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Trial
- Community- and individual-level correlates of HIV incidence in HPTN 071 (PopART).Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2023Trial
- Barriers and Facilitators to, and Experience of, Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in China: A Mixed-Methods Study.Archives of sexual behavior · 2023Trial
- Use of Varied Screening Risk Criteria and HIV Incidence in Phase 1 and 2 HIV Vaccine Trials in South Africa.AIDS and behavior · 2023Trial
- Trial
- ShangRing versus Mogen clamp for early infant male circumcision in eastern sub-Saharan Africa: a multicentre, non-inferiority, adaptive, randomised controlled trial.The Lancet. Global health · 2022Trial
1,003 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on byRubbery figures?2006
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on byThe money issue.2006
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundObservational studies suggest that male circumcision may provide protection against HIV-1 infection. A randomized, controlled intervention trial was conducted in a general population of South Africa to test this hypothesis. METHODS AND
findingsA total of 3,274 uncircumcised men, aged 18-24 y, were randomized to a control or an intervention group with follow-up visits at months 3, 12, and 21. Male circumcision was offered to the intervention group immediately after randomization and to the control group at the end of the follow-up. The grouped censored data were analyzed in intention-to-treat, univariate and multivariate, analyses, using piecewise exponential, proportional hazards models. Rate ratios (RR) of HIV incidence were determined with 95% CI. Protection against HIV infection was calculated as 1 - RR. The trial was stopped at the interim analysis, and the mean (interquartile range) follow-up was 18.1 mo (13.0-21.0) when the data were analyzed. There were 20 HIV infections (incidence rate = 0.85 per 100 person-years) in the intervention group and 49 (2.1 per 100 person-years) in the control group, corresponding to an RR of 0.40 (95% CI: 0.24%-0.68%; p < 0.001). This RR corresponds to a protection of 60% (95% CI: 32%-76%). When controlling for behavioural factors, including sexual behaviour that increased slightly in the intervention group, condom use, and health-seeking behaviour, the protection was of 61% (95% CI: 34%-77%).
conclusionMale circumcision provides a degree of protection against acquiring HIV infection, equivalent to what a vaccine of high efficacy would have achieved. Male circumcision may provide an important way of reducing the spread of HIV infection in sub-Saharan Africa. (Preliminary and partial results were presented at the International AIDS Society 2005 Conference, on 26 July 2005, in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.