Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16231967›Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacokinetics2005

Single-dose clinical pharmacokinetic studies of gefitinib.

Helen C Swaisland, Robert P Smith, Alison Laight, David J Kerr, Malcolm Ranson, Clive H Wilder-Smith, Thierry Duvauchelle

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 141 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Safe handling of oral antineoplastic medications: Focus on targeted therapeutics in the home setting.Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Effects of food on the relative bioavailability of lapatinib in cancer patients.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2009
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Acidifying agents impact erlotinib and gefitinib pharmacokinetic parameters and elevate liver enzymes in Wistar rats.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Helen C SwaislandAstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Macclesfield, UK. helen.swaisland@astrazeneca.com
Robert P Smith
Alison Laight
David J Kerr
Malcolm Ranson
Clive H Wilder-Smith
Thierry Duvauchelle
AstraZeneca (Singapore) · SGAster · ITAstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GBQueen Elizabeth University Hospital · GBThe Christie Hospital · GBUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective of the five clinical studies presented in this article was to investigate the single-dose pharmacokinetics of gefitinib (IRESSA, ZD1839), an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in healthy volunteers and patients with advanced cancer.

methodsStudies 1 and 3-5 recruited healthy male volunteers aged 18-65 years; study 2 recruited male or female patients aged>or=18 years with any solid malignant tumour expressing EGFR and refractory to standard therapy. Gefitinib administration was as follows: study 1 (bioavailability in healthy volunteers; n=12)--intravenous infusion of 50 or 100 mg followed by a single oral dose of 250 mg; study 2 (bioavailability in cancer patients; n=19)--intravenous infusion of 50 mg followed by a single oral dose of 250 mg; study 3 (intrasubject variability; n=24)--two single oral doses of 250 mg; study 4 (dose-proportionality; n=15)--three single oral doses of 50-500 mg; study 5 (effect of food; n=26)--two single doses of 250 mg under either fed or fasted conditions. In all studies, venous blood samples for determination of gefitinib plasma concentrations were collected at predetermined intervals. Plasma concentrations of gefitinib were measured using liquid-liquid extraction after basification followed by high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometric detection. Appropriate pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by noncompartmental methods.

resultsStudy 1: Oral bioavailability of a gefitinib 250 mg dose was 57% in healthy volunteers. Absorption was moderately slow, with geometric mean (gmean) peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of 85 ng/mL (range 43.5-110 ng/mL) reached 5 hours following an oral dose of 250 mg. Study 2: Oral bioavailability of a gefitinib 250 mg dose was 59% in patients. Absorption was again moderately slow, with gmean Cmax of 159 ng/mL (range 48.7-324 ng/mL) typically reached 3 hours (range 1-8 hours) following an oral dose of 250 mg. Study 3: Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUCinfinity) and Cmax were variable--up to 15-fold between subjects and 2-fold within an individual. Study 4: AUCinfinity and Cmax increased with dose across the range of 50-500 mg, and increased dose-proportionally up to 250 mg. Study 5: Small, clinically insignificant increases in AUCinfinity and Cmax were seen in the presence of food (32% and 37%, respectively).

conclusionsThe gefitinib 250 mg tablet is orally bioavailable in both healthy volunteers and cancer patients; bioavailability is independent of dose and unaffected by food to any clinically significant extent. Gefitinib undergoes rapid plasma clearance and has an extensive volume of distribution, resulting in a pharmacokinetic profile supportive of a once-daily dosage regimen.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdolescentAdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsArea Under CurveBiological AvailabilityCross-Over StudiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugEpidermal Growth FactorFastingFemaleGefitinibHumansInjections, IntravenousLinear ModelsAntineoplastic AgentsEpidermal Growth FactorGefitinibQuinazolinesSuspensionsTablets

Identifiers

PMID16231967
OpenAlexW2063851889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.