ReviewDrug safety2005
Risk management strategies in the postmarketing period : safety experience with the US and European bosentan surveillance programmes.
Review in Drug safety, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Adverse Effects of Endothelin Receptor Antagonists: Insights From the Meta-Analysis of 4894 Patients From 24 Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trials.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2016Pooled it
- Views on the Development and Use of a New Digital Adverse Drug Event Reporting Platform in Australia: A Qualitative Study.Drug safety · 2025Article
- Co-Designing a Consumer-Focused Digital Reporting Health Platform to Improve Adverse Medicine Event Reporting: Protocol for a Multimethod Research Project (the ReMedi Project).JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Kidney Dysfunction, Hepatic Impairment, and Lipid Metabolism Abnormalities in Patients with Precapillary Pulmonary Hypertension.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Endothelial shear stress enhancements: a potential solution for critically ill Covid-19 patients.Biomedical engineering online · 2020Article
- A network meta-analysis for safety of endothelin receptor antagonists in pulmonary arterial hypertension.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2019Article
- Article
- Pharmacogenomics of CYP2C9: Functional and Clinical Considerations.Journal of personalized medicine · 2017Review
- Factors Influencing the Use of a Mobile App for Reporting Adverse Drug Reactions and Receiving Safety Information: A Qualitative Study.Drug safety · 2017Article
- Comparative safety and tolerability of endothelin receptor antagonists in pulmonary arterial hypertension.Drug safety · 2015Review
- Intrapulmonary shear stress enhancement: a new therapeutic approach in pulmonary arterial hypertension.Pediatric cardiology · 2012Article
- Modelling the time to onset of adverse reactions with parametric survival distributions: a potential approach to signal detection and evaluation.Drug safety · 2010Article
- Safety-related regulatory actions for orphan drugs in the US and EU: a cohort study.Drug safety · 2010Article
- New approaches to drug safety: a pharmacovigilance tool kit.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2009Review
- Heterogeneous but "standard" coding systems for adverse events: Issues in achieving interoperability between apples and oranges.Contemporary clinical trials · 2008Article
- An automated standardized system for managing adverse events in clinical research networks.Drug safety · 2008Review
- RevAssist: a comprehensive risk minimization programme for preventing fetal exposure to lenalidomide.Drug safety · 2008Article
- What is drug safety?: celebrating 20 years of the Drug Safety journal.Drug safety · 2006Article
- Liver abnormalities in pulmonary arterial hypertension.Pulmonary circulationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In view of the shortcomings of the current system for postmarketing drug surveillance that is based on voluntary spontaneous adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting, new approaches are needed. We describe an approach involving a combination of limited distribution, patient and physician education, as well as a novel pharmaco-vigilance system that is capable of promoting the safe and adequate use of a new drug. Importantly, it provides the possibility of calculating true ADR occurrence rates, as the exposed population (denominator) and the number of patients with events (numerator) are known. These measures were taken for the oral dual endothelin ET(A)/ET(B) antagonist bosentan (Tracleer). In recent guidelines issued by the European Society of Cardiology, American College of Chest Physicians and the WHO, this drug is considered as first-line oral treatment for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension, a devastating orphan disease associated with a poor prognosis. Bosentan was approved in 2001/2 on the basis of two pivotal studies that showed improved exercise capacity and haemodynamic parameters while delaying time to clinical worsening. Elevations in serum liver aminotransferase levels of >3 times the upper limit of normal were noted in 10.2% of patients (placebo-subtracted incidence). Therefore, liver function tests have to be performed on a regular basis. In addition, bosentan has potential as a teratogen. In the US, a controlled distribution network for bosentan (Tracleer) Access Program [T.A.P.]) and the development of a patient database to follow patients was set up. Accompanied by comprehensive physician and patient education programmes, T.A.P. was developed to provide a mechanism to assist with the primary risk management goals for bosentan therapy, namely pregnancy prevention and liver enzyme monitoring and prevention of hepatic injury. In Europe, the Tracleer) Excellence (TRAX PMS) database is a novel European non-interventional, prospective, internet-based surveillance system initiated by the manufacturer in cooperation with the European Medicines Agency. It collected potential safety signals associated with bosentan use including adverse events, elevations of liver aminotransferase levels, other abnormal laboratory values, death and hospitalisation. TRAX PMS has accrued 79% of all known patients in the EU and the data provide supportive 'real-life' evidence on the long-term safety of bosentan. The two different systems had similar goals and outcomes. The data received concerning thousands of patient-years of use have confirmed the clinical trial results regarding product safety and the favourable benefit/risk ratio of bosentan, especially with regard to known type A adverse events. The clinical monitoring algorithm has also been confirmed. In addition, no rare type B events were uncovered despite the increased reporting rate. These systems might serve as templates for future pharmaco-vigilance efforts regarding drugs that require particular safety attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.