Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16231952›Full record

ReviewDrug safety2005

Risk management strategies in the postmarketing period : safety experience with the US and European bosentan surveillance programmes.

Eleanor S Segal, Cecile Valette, Laurence Oster, Luc Bouley, Catarina Edfjall, Peter Herrmann, Massimo Raineri, Mary Kempff, Saundra Beacham, Cinda van Lierop

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drug safety, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eleanor S SegalDepartment of Global Drug Safety, Drug Regulatory Affairs and Biometry, Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland. Ealonor.Segal@actelion.com
Cecile Valette
Laurence Oster
Luc Bouley
Catarina Edfjall
Peter Herrmann
Massimo Raineri
Mary Kempff
Saundra Beacham
Cinda van Lierop
Actelion (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In view of the shortcomings of the current system for postmarketing drug surveillance that is based on voluntary spontaneous adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting, new approaches are needed. We describe an approach involving a combination of limited distribution, patient and physician education, as well as a novel pharmaco-vigilance system that is capable of promoting the safe and adequate use of a new drug. Importantly, it provides the possibility of calculating true ADR occurrence rates, as the exposed population (denominator) and the number of patients with events (numerator) are known. These measures were taken for the oral dual endothelin ET(A)/ET(B) antagonist bosentan (Tracleer). In recent guidelines issued by the European Society of Cardiology, American College of Chest Physicians and the WHO, this drug is considered as first-line oral treatment for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension, a devastating orphan disease associated with a poor prognosis. Bosentan was approved in 2001/2 on the basis of two pivotal studies that showed improved exercise capacity and haemodynamic parameters while delaying time to clinical worsening. Elevations in serum liver aminotransferase levels of >3 times the upper limit of normal were noted in 10.2% of patients (placebo-subtracted incidence). Therefore, liver function tests have to be performed on a regular basis. In addition, bosentan has potential as a teratogen. In the US, a controlled distribution network for bosentan (Tracleer) Access Program [T.A.P.]) and the development of a patient database to follow patients was set up. Accompanied by comprehensive physician and patient education programmes, T.A.P. was developed to provide a mechanism to assist with the primary risk management goals for bosentan therapy, namely pregnancy prevention and liver enzyme monitoring and prevention of hepatic injury. In Europe, the Tracleer) Excellence (TRAX PMS) database is a novel European non-interventional, prospective, internet-based surveillance system initiated by the manufacturer in cooperation with the European Medicines Agency. It collected potential safety signals associated with bosentan use including adverse events, elevations of liver aminotransferase levels, other abnormal laboratory values, death and hospitalisation. TRAX PMS has accrued 79% of all known patients in the EU and the data provide supportive 'real-life' evidence on the long-term safety of bosentan. The two different systems had similar goals and outcomes. The data received concerning thousands of patient-years of use have confirmed the clinical trial results regarding product safety and the favourable benefit/risk ratio of bosentan, especially with regard to known type A adverse events. The clinical monitoring algorithm has also been confirmed. In addition, no rare type B events were uncovered despite the increased reporting rate. These systems might serve as templates for future pharmaco-vigilance efforts regarding drugs that require particular safety attention.

Indexed as

Product Surveillance, PostmarketingRisk ManagementAbnormalities, Drug-InducedAntihypertensive AgentsBosentanEuropeHumansLiverSafetySulfonamidesUnited StatesAntihypertensive AgentsBosentanSulfonamides

Identifiers

PMID16231952
OpenAlexW1986013929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.