Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16231178›Full record

ReviewVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2005

Ancillary techniques in bone marrow pathology: molecular diagnostics on bone marrow trephine biopsies.

Falko Fend, Oliver Bock, Markus Kremer, Katja Specht, Leticia Quintanilla-Martinez

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Falko FendInstitute of Pathology, Technical University Munich, Ismaningerstrasse 22, 81675 Munich, Germany. fend@lrz.tum.de
Oliver Bock
Markus Kremer
Katja Specht
Leticia Quintanilla-Martinez

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pathologic examination of trephine bone marrow (BM) biopsies plays a central role in the diagnosis and staging of haematological neoplasms and other disorders affecting haematopoiesis. Haematopathology has been profoundly influenced by the advent of molecular genetic techniques suitable for paraffin-embedded tissues, and certain applications, such as the determination of B- and T-cell clonality, belong to its standard diagnostic repertoire. Many of these molecular tests can be performed successfully with nucleic acids extracted from BM trephine biopsies, if some technical aspects specific to this template source such as various fixation and decalcification procedures are taken into consideration. The current indications for molecular BM diagnostics range from the confirmation of lymphoma involvement with gene rearrangement analysis, demonstration of tumor-specific translocations in lymphoid and chronic myeloproliferative disorders along to the detection of microorganisms or marrow involvement by soft tissue sarcomas. The availability of quantitative polymerase chain reaction techniques for the investigation of allelic imbalances and gene expression levels in paraffin-embedded material also open new avenues for research and advanced diagnostics. The molecular detection of minimal residual disease in haematological neoplasms, especially in the context of new treatment strategies, will provide future challenges. This article summarizes the current state of the art in molecular diagnostics applied to paraffin-embedded BM biopsies.

Indexed as

BiopsyGenetic TechniquesBone MarrowGene ExpressionGene Rearrangement, B-LymphocyteHematologic NeoplasmsHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionT-Lymphocytes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.