Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16231042›Full record

ReviewGene therapy2005

Downstream processing of viral vectors and vaccines.

R Morenweiser

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Gene therapy, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 171 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Temperature-modulated separation of therapeutic cells, viral vectors, and exosomes using functional polymers.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Lessons learned from COVID-19 pandemic: Vaccine platform is a key player.Process biochemistry (Barking, London, England) · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

R MorenweiserGE Healthcare, Amersham Biosciences Europe GmbH, Fast Trak Services Europe, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Viral vectors and viral vaccines more and more play an important role in current medical approaches. Gene vectors like adenoviruses, adeno-associated viruses or retroviruses are the vehicles being developed for delivering genetic material to the target cell in gene therapy. Viral vaccines, like attenuated or inactivated rabies virus, influenza virus or hepatitis virus vaccines, are powerful tools to limit the number of serious viral infections and pandemics. Higher safety demands, that is, reduction of side effects, by regulatory authorities like Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMEA), nowadays force developers as well as manufacturers to improve their production and purification processes for viral vectors and vaccines. Like for influenza viral vaccines, manufacturers begin to switch from egg cultivation to mammalian cell culture systems. Also within the purification procedure, a clear trend from classical purification methods like sucrose gradient centrifugation towards more sophisticated techniques like tangential flow filtration and liquid chromatography can be observed.

Indexed as

BiotechnologyAnimalsCell LineChromatographyGenetic VectorsGene Transfer TechniquesHumansSafetyViral VaccinesVirus CultivationViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID16231042
OpenAlexW2020843955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.