ArticleEndocrine2005
Estrous cycle specific immunolocalization of different domains of the epidermal growth factor receptor in the porcine oviduct.
Article in Endocrine, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Selective sweep analysis reveals extensive parallel selection traits between large white and Duroc pigs.Evolutionary applications · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although porcine uterus is known to contain active and inactive forms of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R), the latter consist of the extracellular domain only; it is currently unknown whether different EGF-R isoforms are expressed in the porcine oviduct during estrous cycle. Therefore, we used two different monoclonal antibodies, one against the extracellular and the other against the cytoplasmic domain of the EGF-R, to investigate cycle-dependent and cell-type-specific expression of full-size and truncated receptor forms. At metestrus, the majority of epithelial cells of the oviduct were strongly immunopositive for both antibodies, indicating the presence of the full-size receptor. In diestrous and proestrous stages, we found a low level of cytoplasmic but no extracellular EGF-R staining in epithelial cells. While the staining intensity of cytoplasmic domain of the EGF-R was only faint or absent in muscular tissue and blood vessels throughout the estrous cycle, extracellular domain of the EGF-R exhibited a strong immunostaining of smooth muscle cells and vascular smooth muscle cells, especially in diestrous and proestrous stages. There was no significant difference between the oviductal ampulla and isthmus in either the intensity or the pattern of both cytoplasmic and extracellular EGF-R immunostaining. We conclude that the restricted presence of the functional full-size receptor to the epithelial layer indicates a specific role during early embryonic development, whereas truncated EGF-R forms may potentially regulate contractions and blood flow in the oviduct.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.