Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16230637›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2005

Insights into the organization and dynamics of bacterial chemoreceptor clusters through in vivo crosslinking studies.

Claudia A Studdert, John S Parkinson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The structural logic of dynamic signaling in the Escherichia coli serine chemoreceptor.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024
    Article
  4. The Structural Logic of Dynamic Signaling in thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The Only Chemoreceptor Encoded byMicroorganisms · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The Impact ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Conformational shifts in a chemoreceptor helical hairpin control kinase signaling inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Paradoxical enhancement of chemoreceptor detection sensitivity by a sensory adaptation enzyme.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Phenotypic Heterogeneity in Sugar Utilization byFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Claudia A StuddertDepartment of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
John S Parkinson
California Institute of Technology · US

Funding

UTAH REGIONAL CANCER CENTERP30CA042014 · NCI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Jared P Rutter · 1986 to 2026
$72.6M
Intracellular Signaling by Bacterial ChemoreceptorsR01GM019559 · NIGMS · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI JOHN S PARKINSON · 1985 to 2026
$12.3M
INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING BY BACTERIAL CHEMORECEPTORSR37GM019559 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI PARKINSON, JOHN S · 1992 to 2001
$806k
NCI NIH HHS CA 42014NCI NIH HHS P30 CA042014NIGMS NIH HHS GM 19559NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM019559NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM019559
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The team signaling model for bacterial chemoreceptors proposes that receptor dimers of different detection specificities form mixed trimers of dimers that bind the cytoplasmic proteins CheA and CheW to form ternary signaling complexes clustered at the cell poles. We used a trifunctional crosslinking reagent targeted to cysteine residues in the aspartate (Tar) and serine (Tsr) receptors to obtain in vivo snapshots of trimer composition in the receptor population. To analyze the dynamics of trimer formation, we followed the appearance of mixed trimers when cells expressing Tar were induced for the expression of Tsr and treated with the crosslinker shortly after the onset of induction. In the absence of CheA or CheW, preformed Tar trimers exchanged partners readily with newly made Tsr. Conversely, in the presence of CheA and CheW, receptor trimers seldom exchanged partners, irrespective of the presence or absence of attractants. The C-terminal receptor-coupling domain of the CheA kinase, which contains binding determinants for the CheW protein, was essential for conferring low exchangeability to the preformed trimers of dimers. CheW also was required for this effect, but, unlike CheA, overexpression of CheW interfered with trimer formation and chemotactic behavior. The CheW effect probably occurs through binding interactions that mask the receptor sites needed for trimer formation. We propose that clustered receptors are organized in mixed trimers of dimers through binding interactions with CheA and CheW, which play distinctly different architectural roles. Moreover, once complete signaling teams have formed, they no longer undergo dynamic exchange of receptor members.

Indexed as

ChemotaxisBacterial ProteinsDimerizationEscherichia coli ProteinsHistidine KinaseMembrane ProteinsMethyl-Accepting Chemotaxis ProteinsReceptors, Amino Acidaspartic acid receptorBacterial ProteinscheA protein, E coliCheW protein, E coliEscherichia coli ProteinsHistidine KinaseMembrane ProteinsMethyl-Accepting Chemotaxis ProteinsReceptors, Amino Acidserine receptortsr protein, E coli

Identifiers

PMID16230637
PMCPMC1266109
OpenAlexW2160195264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.