Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16228360›Full record

ArticlePhotosynthesis research2001

The home stretch, a first analysis of the nearly completed genome of Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1.

C Mackenzie, M Choudhary, F W Larimer, P F Predki, S Stilwagen, J P Armitage, R D Barber, T J Donohue, J P Hosler, J E Newman and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Photosynthesis research, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 142 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Complete genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Divided Bacterial Genome: Structure, Function, and Evolution.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2017
    Review
  20. Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

C MackenzieDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Texas-Houston Medical School, 6431 Fannin St., Houston, TX 77030, USA.
M Choudhary
F W Larimer
P F Predki
S Stilwagen
J P Armitage
R D Barber
T J Donohue
J P Hosler
J E Newman
J P Shapleigh
R E Sockett
J Zeilstra-Ryalls
S Kaplan
Joint Genome Institute · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USCornell University · USOak Ridge National Laboratory · USTexas Medical Center · USUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center · USUniversity of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Rochester · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Parkside · US

Funding

PROCESS AND REGULATION OF CYTOCHROME C SYNTHESISR01GM037509 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI DONOHUE, TIMOTHY J · 1988 to 2002
$852k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM037509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1 is an alpha-3 purple nonsulfur eubacterium with an extensive metabolic repertoire. Under anaerobic conditions, it is able to grow by photosynthesis, respiration and fermentation. Photosynthesis may be photoheterotrophic using organic compounds as both a carbon and a reducing source, or photoautotrophic using carbon dioxide as the sole carbon source and hydrogen as the source of reducing power. In addition, R. sphaeroides can grow both chemoheterotrophically and chemoautotrophically. The structural components of this metabolically diverse organism and their modes of integrated regulation are encoded by a genome of approximately 4.5 Mb in size. The genome comprises two chromosomes CI and CII (2.9 and 0.9 Mb, respectively) and five other replicons. Sequencing of the genome has been carried out by two groups, the Joint Genome Institute, which carried out shotgun-sequencing of the entire genome and The University of Texas-Houston Medical School, which carried out a targeted sequencing strategy of CII. Here we describe our current understanding of the genome when data from both of these groups are combined. Previous work had suggested that the two chromosomes are equal partners sharing responsibilities for fundamental cellular processes. This view has been reinforced by our preliminary analysis of the virtually completed genome sequence. We also have some evidence to suggest that two of the plasmids, pRS241a and pRS241b encode chromosomal type functions and their role may be more than that of accessory elements, perhaps representing replicons in a transition state.

Identifiers

PMID16228360
OpenAlexW1265763149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.