Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16227545›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry2005

Imaging of the brain in acute ischaemic stroke: comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging.

P A Barber, M D Hill, M Eliasziw, A M Demchuk, J H W Pexman, M E Hudon, A Tomanek, R Frayne, A M Buchan, ASPECTS Study Group

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 115 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
115citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

115 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 358 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article

55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P A BarberSeaman Family Magnetic Resonance Research Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary T2N 4N1, Canada. pabarber@ucalgary.ca
M D Hill
M Eliasziw
A M Demchuk
J H W Pexman
M E Hudon
A Tomanek
R Frayne
A M Buchan
ASPECTS Study Group
University of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesControversy exists about the optimal imaging technique in acute stroke. It was hypothesised that CT is comparable with DWI, when both are read systematically using quantitative scoring.

methodsIschaemic stroke patients who had CT within six hours and DWI within seven hours of onset were included. Five readers used a quantitative scoring system (ASPECTS) to read the baseline (b) and follow up CT and DWI. Use of MRI in acute stroke was also assessed in patients treated with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) by prospectively recording reasons for exclusion. Patients were followed clinically at three months.

resultsbDWI and bCT were available for 100 consecutive patients (admission median NIHSS = 9). The mean bDWI and bCT ASPECTS were positively related (p<0.001). The level of interrater agreement ranged from good to excellent across all modalities and time periods. Bland-Altman plots showed more variability between bCT and bDWI than at 24 hours. The difference between bCT and bDWI was < or =2 ASPECTS points. Of bCT scans with ASPECTS 8-10, 81% had DWI ASPECTS 8-10. Patients with bCT ASPECTS of 8-10 were 1.9 times more likely to have a favourable outcome at 90 days than those with a score of 0-7 (95% CI 1.1 to 3.1, p = 0.002). The relative likelihood of favourable outcome with a bDWI ASPECTS 8-10 was 1.4 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.9, p = 0.10). Of patients receiving tPA 45% had contraindications to urgent MRI.

conclusionThe differences between CT and DWI in visualising early infarction are small when using ASPECTS. CT is faster and more accessible than MRI, and therefore is the better neuroimaging modality for the treatment of acute stroke.

Indexed as

BrainDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedBrain IschemiaCerebrovascular CirculationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID16227545
PMCPMC1739399
OpenAlexW2110483627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.