ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2005
Information resource preferences by general pediatricians in office settings: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Severe Combined Immunodeficiency: Knowledge and Information Needs Among Healthcare Providers.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- Using scenario-based training to promote information literacy among on-call consultant pediatricians.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2017Article
- Advancing the application of systems thinking in health: advice seeking behavior among primary health care physicians in Pakistan.Health research policy and systems · 2014Article
- Knowledge flow and exchange in interdisciplinary primary health care teams (PHCTs): an exploratory study.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2013Article
- Use of the internet by Italian pediatricians: habits, impact on clinical practice and expectations.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2012Article
- Automated dose-rounding recommendations for pediatric medications.Pediatrics · 2011Review
- Physicians and their use of information: a survey comparison between the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2011Article
- Information-seeking behavior of basic science researchers: implications for library services.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2010Article
- Communicating genetic information: a difficult challenge for future pediatricians.BMC medical education · 2007Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInformation needs and resource preferences of office-based general pediatricians have not been well characterized.
methodsData collected from a sample of twenty office-based urban/suburban general pediatricians consisted of: (a) a demographic survey about participants' practice and computer use, (b) semi-structured interviews on their use of different types of information resources and (c) semi-structured interviews on perceptions of information needs and resource preferences in response to clinical vignettes representing cases in Genetics and Infectious Diseases. Content analysis of interviews provided participants' perceived use of resources and their perceived questions and preferred resources in response to vignettes.
resultsParticipants' average time in practice was 15.4 years (2-28 years). All had in-office online access. Participants identified specialist/generalist colleagues, general/specialty pediatric texts, drug formularies, federal government/professional organization Websites and medical portals (when available) as preferred information sources. They did not identify decision-making texts, evidence-based reviews, journal abstracts, medical librarians or consumer health information for routine office use.In response to clinical vignettes in Genetics and Infectious Diseases, participants identified Question Types about patient-specific (diagnosis, history and findings) and general medical (diagnostic, therapeutic and referral guidelines) information. They identified specialists and specialty textbooks, history and physical examination, colleagues and general pediatric textbooks, and federal and professional organizational Websites as information sources. Participants with access to portals identified them as information resources in lieu of texts. For Genetics vignettes, participants identified questions about prenatal history, disease etiology and treatment guidelines. For Genetics vignettes, they identified patient history, specialists, general pediatric texts, Web search engines and colleagues as information sources. For Infectious Diseases (ID) vignettes, participants identified questions about patients' clinical status at presentation and questions about disease classification, diagnosis/therapy/referral guidelines and sources of patient education. For ID vignettes, they identified history, laboratory results, colleagues, specialists and personal experience as information sources.
conclusionContent analysis of office-based general pediatricians' responses to clinical vignettes provided a qualitative description of their perceptions of information needs and preferences for information resource for cases in Genetics and Infectious Diseases. This approach may provide complementary information for discovering practitioner's information needs and resource preferences in different contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.