Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16225406›Full record

ArticleGenetic testing2005

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer family members' perceptions about the duty to inform and health professionals' role in disseminating genetic information.

Rebecca D Pentz, Susan K Peterson, Beatty Watts, Sally W Vernon, Patrick M Lynch, Laura M Koehly, Ellen R Gritz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetic testing, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Worldwide Practice Patterns in Lynch Syndrome Diagnosis and Management, Based on Data From the International Mismatch Repair Consortium.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rebecca D PentzWinship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA. Rebecca.Pentz@emoryhealthcare.org
Susan K Peterson
Beatty Watts
Sally W Vernon
Patrick M Lynch
Laura M Koehly
Ellen R Gritz

Funding

The influence of familial social context on risk dissemination and copingZ01HG200335 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI KOEHLY, LAURA M · 2006 to 2008
$1.2M
PSYCHOSOCIAL ASPECTS OF GENETIC TESTING FOR HNPCCR01HG001200 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI GRITZ, ELLEN R · 1994 to 2000
$449k
NHGRI NIH HHS 2R01HG1200-6NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG001200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study's aim was to ascertain hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) families' views on the duty to inform with particular focus on the role of health professionals in disseminating familial genetic information. Eighty members of 16 families with a clinical or molecular diagnosis of HNPCC completed qualitative interviews regarding views on family members' right to know and who should disseminate familial genetic information. Most indicated that everyone in the family should know about the presence of a mutation in the family, with family members themselves being the preferable informant, supported by health professionals who were seen as helpful in overcoming barriers. All but one respondent indicated that if a parent did not test and presumably did not inform his/her child about the family mutation, the child should be informed by other family members or by a health professional. Many were attuned to confidentiality concerns, but judged them to be outweighed by the importance of family members knowing about the mutation and undertaking proper surveillance. Respondents were more private about the disclosure of individual results to other family members, clearly distinguishing personal results from familial genetic information. These families with a hereditary colon cancer syndrome favor open sharing of genetic information within the family, and desire the supportive involvement of health care professionals in disseminating genetic information.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelInformation DisseminationProfessional RoleAdultAgedAged, 80 and overColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisConfidentialityCross-Sectional StudiesFamilyFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedEmpirical ApproachGenetics and Reproduction

Identifiers

PMID16225406
PMCPMC4007282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.