SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2005
Cost effectiveness of complementary treatments in the United Kingdom: systematic review.
Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- CAM practitioners in the Australian health workforce: an underutilized resource.BMC complementary and alternative medicine · 2012Article
- Article
- The use of economic evaluation in CAM: an introductory framework.BMC complementary and alternative medicine · 2010Article
- The impact of NHS based primary care complementary therapy services on health outcomes and NHS costs: a review of service audits and evaluations.BMC complementary and alternative medicine · 2009Review
- How the public is being misled about complementary/alternative medicine.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2008Article
- How do we evaluate outcome in an integrative oncology program?Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2008Article
- Complementary and alternative medicine: what the NHS should be funding?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2008Article
- Appraisals of specific treatments are needed.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2007Article
- Cost-effectiveness of complementary therapies in the United kingdom-a systematic review.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2006Article
- Acupuncture in mainstream health care.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2006Article
- The "Smallwood report": method or madness?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2006Article
- Scientific evidence was ignored in CAM and the NHS.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2005Article
- Complementary therapies and the NHS.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.