Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16222308›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2005

Psychosocial difficulties, deprivation and cancer: three questionnaire studies involving 609 cancer patients.

P Wright, A Smith, L Booth, A Winterbottom, M Kiely, G Velikova, P Selby

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Assessing the social impact of cancer: a review of available tools.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2012
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Social consequences of advanced cancer in patients and their informal caregivers: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Article
  10. Predictors of quality of life in head and neck cancer survivors up to 5 years after end of treatment: a cross-sectional survey.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Routine assessment of social difficulties in cancer patients: are we opening Pandora's box?Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2009
    Article
  15. Measuring social difficulties in routine patient-centred assessment: a Rasch analysis of the social difficulties inventory.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2007
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

P WrightPsychosocial and Clinical Practice Research Group, Cancer Research UK Clinical Centre in Leeds, St James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK. medepw@cancermed.leeds.ac.uk
A Smith
L Booth
A Winterbottom
M Kiely
G Velikova
P Selby

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the study is to investigate associations between deprivation and self-reported social difficulties and psychological distress in cancer patients. A total of 304 men and 305 women (age range 18-88 years) with a range of cancer diagnoses and living in a socially diverse region (Carstairs and Morris index) completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Social Difficulties Inventory. Univariate analyses of variance revealed statistically significant differences in reported social difficulties between groups (F (67, 576)=2.4, P<0.0001) with stage of disease (F (5, 576)=7.6, P<0.0001), age (F (2, 576)=4.8, P=0.009) and to a lesser extent deprivation (F (1, 576)=4.0, P=0.048) making significant contributions. Significantly more social difficulties were reported by less affluent patients with locally recurrent disease or 'survivors'. No other interactions were found. Significant differences in levels of reported psychological distress were found between groups (F (67, 575)=1.723, P=0.001) for stage of disease, sex and deprivation but no interactions observed. In conclusion, deprivation is associated with reported psychological distress and, to a lesser extent, social difficulties. Patients at particular risk cannot be identified with confidence by socio-demographic and clinical means supporting the recommendation from National Institute for Clinical Excellence for provision of psychosocial assessment for individual cancer patients.

Indexed as

Psychosocial DeprivationSocial EnvironmentSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesDemographyFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsStress, Psychological

Identifiers

PMID16222308
PMCPMC2361625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.