Intracranial angioplasty & stenting for cerebral atherosclerosis: a position statement of the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the American Society of Neuroradiology.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Trends in intracranial stenting among medicare beneficiaries in the United States, 2006-2010.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2013
   Article
2. A Comparison of Stent Implant versus Medical Treatment for Severe Symptomatic Intracranial Stenosis: A Controlled Clinical Trial.Cerebrovascular diseases extra · 2012
   Article
3. Treatment of symptomatic high-grade intracranial stenoses with the balloon-expandable Pharos stent: initial experience.Neuroradiology · 2008
   Article
4. Critical appraisal of medical devices in the management of cerebrovascular disease.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2008
   Article
5. Carotid interventions above and below the bulb.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2007
   Article
6. Angioplasty of an idiopathic intracranial arterial stenosis.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2006
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as