ArticlePLoS medicine2005
Clinical trial registration: the differing views of industry, the WHO, and the Ottawa Group.
Article in PLoS medicine, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Trials in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Therapy: A Comprehensive Analysis of Trials Registered in Global Clinical Databases.Drug design, development and therapy · 2023Article
- Quality assessment and its influencing factors of lung cancer clinical research registration: a cross-sectional analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2022Article
- A comparative analysis of important public clinical trial registries, and a proposal for an interim ideal one.PloS one · 2021Article
- Article
- Quality assessment of clinical trial registration with traditional Chinese medicine in WHO registries.BMJ open · 2019Article
- Article
- Setting the IMPACT (IMProve Access to Clinical Trial data) Observatory baseline.Biochemia medica · 2018Review
- Analysis of the Registration Information on Interventions of Acupuncture and Moxibustion Trials in the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2018Review
- A machine learning approach to identify clinical trials involving nanodrugs and nanodevices from ClinicalTrials.gov.PloS one · 2014Article
- [Postdoctoral qualification regulations of medical faculties in German universities. A comparison of 1998 and 2010].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2012Article
- Result publication of Chinese trials in World Health Organization primary registries.PloS one · 2010Article
- Review
- Compliance of clinical trial registries with the World Health Organization minimum data set: a survey.Trials · 2009Article
- Inadequate dissemination of phase I trials: a retrospective cohort study.PLoS medicine · 2009Article
- Opinions on registering trial details: a survey of academic researchers.BMC health services research · 2008Article
- Article
- Principles for strengthening the integrity of clinical research.PLoS clinical trials · 2006Article
- Clinical trials registration.PLoS medicine · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.