Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16220209›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2006

Brainstem and cerebellar changes after cerebrovascular accidents: magnetic resonance imaging.

A Uchino, Y Takase, K Nomiyama, R Egashira, S Kudo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Early Cerebellar Network Shifting in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 6.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2016
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Remote cell death in the cerebellar system.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2009
    Review
  10. Pathophysiological mechanism of ipsilateral cerebral and brainstem hemiatrophy in basal ganglia germ cell tumors: case report.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2009
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A UchinoDepartment of Radiology, Saga Medical School, 5-1-1 Nabeshima, Saga, 849-8501, Japan. uchino@cc.saga-u.ac.jp
Y Takase
K Nomiyama
R Egashira
S Kudo
Saga Medical School Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We illustrate the various types of secondary degeneration in the brainstem and/or cerebellum detected on magnetic resonance (MR) images obtained after cerebrovascular accidents. The changes include: (a) ipsilateral nigral degeneration after striatal infarction; (b) Wallerian degeneration of the pyramidal tract in the brainstem after supratentorial pyramidal tract or motor cortex injury; (c) Wallerian degeneration of the corticopontine tract in the brainstem after frontal lobe infarction; (d) ipsilateral brainstem atrophy and crossed cerebellar atrophy due to an extensive supratentorial lesion; (e) ipsilateral superior cerebellar peduncle atrophy, contralateral rubral degeneration, contralateral inferior olivary degeneration and ipsilateral cerebellar atrophy after dentate nucleus hemorrhage; (f) ipsilateral inferior olivary degeneration after pontine tegmentum hemorrhage; (g) bilateral wallerian degeneration of the pontocerebellar tracts after ventromedial pontine infarction or basis pontis hemorrhage; and (h) ipsilateral cerebellar atrophy after middle cerebellar peduncle hemorrhage.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrain StemCerebellumFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedStroke

Identifiers

PMID16220209
OpenAlexW2084809128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.