Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16217870›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2005

Response and adaptation by plants to flooding stress.

M B Jackson, T D Colmer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Responses of 'Flordaguard' and 'MP-29'Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  11. Phenotypic, Metabolic and Genetic Adaptations of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. PsammophytesPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M B JacksonSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, UK.
T D Colmer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stress on plants imposed by flooding of the soil and deeper submergence constitutes one of the major abiotic constraints on growth, species' distribution and agricultural productivity. Flooding stress is also a strong driver of adaptive evolution. This has resulted in a wide range of biochemical, molecular and morphological adaptations that sanction growth and reproductive success under episodic or permanently flooded conditions that are highly damaging to the majority of plant species. However, even seemingly poorly adapted species possess some short-term resilience that is important for overall success of these plants in various habitats. The papers contained in this Special Issue address these topics and emphasize molecular, biochemical and developmental processes that impact on flooding tolerance. Most of the articles are based on lectures given to the 8th Conference of the International Society for Plant Anaerobiosis (ISPA), held at the University of Western Australia, Perth, 20-24 September, 2004. Reviews and research papers are presented from the leading laboratories currently working on plant responses to flooding stress.

Indexed as

DisastersPlant Physiological PhenomenaAcclimatizationBiological EvolutionEcosystemEnvironment

Identifiers

PMID16217870
PMCPMC4247020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.