ArticleHeart (British Cardiac Society)2006
Effect of statins on the mortality of patients with ischaemic heart disease: population based cohort study with nested case-control analysis.
Article in Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- The burden of non-adherence to cardiovascular medications among the aging population in Australia: a meta-analysis.Drugs & aging · 2015Pooled it
- Impact of statin adherence on cardiovascular disease and mortality outcomes: a systematic review.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2014Pooled it
- Statin adherence and persistence on secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in Taiwan.Heart Asia · 2019Article
- The role of psychological science in efforts to improve cardiovascular medication adherence.The American psychologist · 2018Review
- Negotiating Tensions Between Theory and Design in the Development of Mailings for People Recovering From Acute Coronary Syndrome.JMIR human factors · 2017Article
- Article
- Article
- Mortality rate increases steeply with nonadherence to statin therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome.Clinical cardiology · 2012Article
- Autophagy, myocardial protection, and the metabolic syndrome.Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology · 2012Review
- Delayed educational reminders for long-term medication adherence in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (DERLA-STEMI): protocol for a pragmatic, cluster-randomized controlled trial.Implementation science : IS · 2012Article
- Impact of therapy with statins, beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on plasma myeloperoxidase in patients with coronary artery disease.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2011Article
- Is an exercise tolerance test indicated before beginning regular exercise? A decision analysis.Journal of general internal medicine · 2009Article
- Derivation and validation of QRISK, a new cardiovascular disease risk score for the United Kingdom: prospective open cohort study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2007Article
- Sex differences in the effectiveness of statins after myocardial infarction.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2007Article
- Effect of combinations of drugs on all cause mortality in patients with ischaemic heart disease: nested case-control analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo measure the effect of statins on mortality for community based patients with ischaemic heart disease and determine whether the likely benefits are similar for women, the elderly, and patients with diabetes.
designOpen prospective cohort study with nested case-control analysis.
setting1.18 million patients registered with 89 practices spread across 23 strategic health authority areas within the UK. All practices had a minimum of eight years of longitudinal data and were contributing to the UK QRESEARCH database. SUBJECTS: All patients with a first diagnosis of ischaemic heart disease between January 1996 and December 2003. OUTCOMES: Adjusted hazard ratio with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all cause mortality (cohort analysis) and odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI (case-control analysis) for current use of statins. Adjustments were made for current use of aspirin, beta blockers, and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, co-morbidity (myocardial infarction, diabetes, hypertension, congestive cardiac failure), smoking, body mass index, and quintile of deprivation.
results13,029 patients had a first diagnosis of ischaemic heart disease in the study period giving an incidence rate of 3.38/1000 person years. 2266 patients with ischaemic heart disease died during the 43,460 person years of observation giving an overall mortality rate of 52.1/1000 person years (95% CI 50.0 to 54.3). In the case-control analysis, patients taking statins had a 39% lower risk of death than did patients not taking statins (adjusted OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.72) after use of other medication, co-morbidity, smoking, body mass index, and deprivation were taken into account. The benefits found in this study compared favourably with those found in the randomised controlled trials, although the current study population is at higher overall risk. The benefits extend to women, patients with diabetes, and the elderly and can be seen within two years of treatment. Longer duration of usage was associated with lower OR for risk of death with a 19% reduction in risk of death with each additional year of treatment (adjusted OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.86 per year). Mortality was similarly reduced among patients prescribed atorvastatin (adjusted OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.79) and simvastatin (adjusted OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.76).
conclusionsThe benefits of statins found in randomised controlled trials extend to unselected community based patients. The benefits can be seen within the first two years of treatment and continue to accrue over time. Since patients in the community are likely to be at higher risk than those in trials, the potential benefits from statins are likely to be greater than expected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.