Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16216860›Full record

ReviewHeart (British Cardiac Society)2006

The changing face of infective endocarditis.

B D Prendergast

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 276 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Molecular methods for diagnosis of infective endocarditis.Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2002
    Guideline
  3. Review
  4. Successful Treatment ofCase reports in infectious diseases · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Metabolites · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Case report: Aorto-left atrial fistula-A rare complication of native aortic valve endocarditis.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Infective Endocarditis: New Spectra, Same Severity.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Meropenem resistantSAGE open medical case reports · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

B D PrendergastDepartment of Cardiology, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, UK. bernard.prendergast@smuht.nwest.nhs.uk
Wythenshawe Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infective endocarditis (IE) is an evolving disease with a persistently high mortality and morbidity, even in the modern era of advanced diagnostic imaging, improved antimicrobial chemotherapy, and potentially curative surgery. Despite these improvements in health care, the incidence of the disease has remained unchanged over the past two decades and may even be increasing. Chronic rheumatic heart disease is now an uncommon antecedent, whereas degenerative valve disease of the elderly, mitral valve prolapse, intravenous drug misuse, preceding valve replacement, and vascular instrumentation have become increasingly common, coinciding with an increase in staphylococcal infections and those caused by fastidious organisms. The current understanding of this difficult condition is reviewed and recent developments in medical and surgical management are updated.

Indexed as

Endocarditis, BacterialHumans

Identifiers

PMID16216860
PMCPMC1860698
OpenAlexW2134509750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.