Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16216855›Full record

ArticleHeart (British Cardiac Society)2006

Historical trends in reported survival rates in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

P M Elliott, J R Gimeno, R Thaman, J Shah, D Ward, S Dickie, M T Tome Esteban, W J McKenna

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03259113 (EvaLuation Using Cardiac Insertable Devices And TelephonE in Hypertrophic CardioMyopathy), which is not on this map. Cited by 92 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03259113 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

EvaLuation Using Cardiac Insertable Devices And TelephonE in Hypertrophic CardioMyopathy

TypeinterventionalSponsorRegion GävleborgRan2017 to 2019Enrolled30ConditionsHypertrophic CardiomyopathyArmsInsertable cardiac monitor
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pacing for drug-refractory or drug-intolerant hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Countywide burden, pathology, and genetics of lethal hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: from the POST SCD study.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Arrhythmogenesis in Fabry Disease.Current cardiology reports · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

P M ElliottThe Heart Hospital, University College London, London, UK. perry.elliott@uclh.org
J R Gimeno
R Thaman
J Shah
D Ward
S Dickie
M T Tome Esteban
W J McKenna

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the range of survival rates of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) by comparing and contrasting the natural history of a cohort of patients seen between 1988 and 2002 with that of other published series.

methods956 adult (> or = 16 years old) patients with HCM (572 men, mean (SD) age 42 (15) years, range 16-88) were evaluated by ECG, Holter, exercise testing, and echocardiography. Patient characteristics and survival data were compared with those in natural history studies from referral and non-referral centres published between 1960 and January 2003.

resultsThe duration of follow up was 69 (45) months. 120 (12.6%) patients died or underwent cardiac transplantation. Sudden cardiac death (n = 48) was the most common mode of death. The annual rate of sudden death or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator discharge was 1.02 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76 to 1.26). Annual rates for heart failure death or transplantation and stroke related death were 0.55% (95% CI 0.37% to 0.78%) and 0.07% (95% CI 0.02% to 0.19%), respectively. When studies published within the last 10 years of the study period were compared with earlier reports, the size of individual study cohorts was larger (309 (240.6) v 136.5 (98.8), p = 0.058) and the proportion with severe functional limitation NYHA class III/IV lower (12.4% v 24.8%, p < 0.0001), and fewer patients underwent septal myotomy-myectomy (5.2% v 18.7%, p < 0.0001). Published sudden death rates over the last 10 years were lower than previously published figures (median 1.0% (range 0.1-1.7) v 2.0% (0-3.5)).

conclusionPublished survival rates in HCM cohorts have improved progressively over the past 40 years. In the modern era the prevalence of disease related complications is similar in all reporting centres.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCardiac Pacing, ArtificialCardiomyopathy, HypertrophicCardiovascular AgentsCause of DeathCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeart TransplantationHumansLondonMaleMiddle AgedCardiovascular Agents

Identifiers

PMID16216855
PMCPMC1860645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.