Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16215718›Full record

Trial reportCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2006

A phase II trial of vaccination with autologous, tumor-derived heat-shock protein peptide complexes Gp96, in combination with GM-CSF and interferon-alpha in metastatic melanoma patients.

Lorenzo Pilla, Roberto Patuzzo, Licia Rivoltini, Michele Maio, Elisabetta Pennacchioli, Elda Lamaj, Andrea Maurichi, Samuele Massarut, Alfonso Marchianò, Cristina Santantonio and 13 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Protein-based nanoparticles in cancer vaccine development.Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Enrichment of Ly6CHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2017
    Article
  14. Unconventional Secretion of Heat Shock Proteins in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Lorenzo PillaUnit of Immunotherapy of Human Tumors, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Via Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Roberto Patuzzo
Licia Rivoltini
Michele Maio
Elisabetta Pennacchioli
Elda Lamaj
Andrea Maurichi
Samuele Massarut
Alfonso Marchianò
Cristina Santantonio
Diego Tosi
Flavio Arienti
Agata Cova
Gloria Sovena
Adriano Piris
Daisuke Nonaka
Ilaria Bersani
Annabella Di Florio
Mariani Luigi
Pramod K Srivastava
Axel Hoos
Mario Santinami
Giorgio Parmiani
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITCentro di Riferimento Oncologico · ITAgenus (United States) · USUniversity of Connecticut · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the immunogenicity and antitumor activity of autologous, tumor-derived heat shock protein gp96-peptide complex vaccine (HSPPC-96; Oncophage given with GM-CSF and IFN-alpha in pre-treated metastatic (AJCC stage IV) melanoma patients. Patients underwent surgical resection of metastatic lesions for HSPPC-96 production. HSPPC-96 was administered subcutaneously (s.c.) in four weekly intervals (first cycle). Patients with more available vaccine and absence of progressive disease received four additional injections in 2-week intervals (second cycle) or more. GM-CSF was given s.c. at the same site at days -1, 0 and +1, while IFN-alpha (3 MU) was administered s.c. at a different site at days +4 and +6. Antigen-specific anti-melanoma T and NK lymphocyte response was assessed by enzyme-linked immunospot assay on peripheral blood mononuclear cells obtained before and after vaccination. Thirty-eight patients were enrolled, 20 received at least four injections (one cycle) of HSPPC-96 and were considered assessable. Toxicity was mild and most treatment-related adverse events were local erythema and induration at the injection site. Patients receiving at least four injections of HSPPC-96 were considered evaluable for clinical response: of the 18 patients with measurable disease post surgery, 11 showed stable disease (SD). The ELISPOT assay revealed an increased class I HLA-restricted T and NK cell-mediated post-vaccination response in 5 out of 17 and 12 out of the 18 patients tested, respectively. Four of the five class I HLA-restricted T cell responses fall in the group of SD patients. Vaccination with autologous HSPPC-96 together with GM-CSF and IFN-alpha is feasible and accompanied by mild local and systemic toxicity. Both tumor-specific T cell-mediated and NK cell responses were generated in a proportion of patients. Clinical activity was limited to SD. However, both immunological and clinical responses were not improved as compared with those recorded in a previous study investigating HSPPC-96 monotherapy.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAdultAgedCancer VaccinesFemaleGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorHeat-Shock ProteinsHLA-A AntigensHumansInterferon-alphaKiller Cells, NaturalMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedT-LymphocytesTreatment OutcomeAdjuvants, ImmunologicCancer VaccinesGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorHeat-Shock ProteinsHLA-A AntigensInterferon-alphavitespin

Identifiers

PMID16215718
PMCPMC11031093
OpenAlexW2035862592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.