ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2005
DNA barcoding Australia's fish species.
Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 816 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
816 citing papers in PubMed.
- DNA Barcoding and Comparative Nutritional Profiling of "Cod" () Products from Chinese E-Commerce Platforms.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Establishment of a Skin Cell Line from Red Tilapia (Oreochromis spp.) and Its Potential Applications in Hyperosmotic Stress and Immune Response Research.Marine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Article
- Global pelagic dispersal traits datasets for early-life stages of marine fishes.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Multilocus DNA Barcoding Resolves Area-Based Genetic Variation in Freshwater Shrimps (Biology · 2026Article
- Conservation and management implications of genetic and geometric scale variation in the ancient fish giant featherback (Chitala lopis).Journal of fish biology · 2026Article
- Cryptic diversity and recent diversification in the Pyrrhulina australis species complex (Characiformes, Lebiasinidae) revealed by mitochondrial DNA.Journal of fish biology · 2026Article
- Taxonomic inflation in fish systematics: A critical review with illustrative evidence assessment and integrative case study of the Salmo trutta Complex.Journal of fish biology · 2026Review
- Genetic (Genomic) and Morphological Evidence Suggest That the Korean Endemic Fat Minnow (Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- DNA barcoding uncovers two putative new species in Trachelyopterus (Siluriformes: Auchenipteridae).Journal of fish biology · 2026Article
- Chromosome level genome assembly and full-length transcriptome of blacktip trevally (Caranx heberi).Scientific data · 2026Article
- Molecular phylogenetics of Kashmir catfish (iScience · 2026Article
- DNA barcode markers for birds of the genus Sporophila: advances in species identification.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Turrum coeruleopinnatum Provides Phylogenetic Context and Candidate Selection Signals Within Carangidae.Biochemical genetics · 2026Article
- Article
- Harnessing Genomic Information for Identifying the Geographic Origin of Five North American Tree Species in Trade.Evolutionary applications · 2026Article
- Mito-Nuclear Discordance and Species Boundaries in the Freshwater Fish GenusEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- New distributional record of Stephanolepis diaspros (Teleostei: Monacanthidae) in the eastern Indian Ocean.Journal of fish biology · 2026Article
- Characterization of Three Complete Mitochondrial Genomes ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
756 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two hundred and seven species of fish, mostly Australian marine fish, were sequenced (barcoded) for a 655 bp region of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I gene (cox1). Most species were represented by multiple specimens, and 754 sequences were generated. The GC content of the 143 species of teleosts was higher than the 61 species of sharks and rays (47.1% versus 42.2%), largely due to a higher GC content of codon position 3 in the former (41.1% versus 29.9%). Rays had higher GC than sharks (44.7% versus 41.0%), again largely due to higher GC in the 3rd codon position in the former (36.3% versus 26.8%). Average within-species, genus, family, order and class Kimura two parameter (K2P) distances were 0.39%, 9.93%, 15.46%, 22.18% and 23.27%, respectively. All species could be differentiated by their cox1 sequence, although single individuals of each of two species had haplotypes characteristic of a congener. Although DNA barcoding aims to develop species identification systems, some phylogenetic signal was apparent in the data. In the neighbour-joining tree for all 754 sequences, four major clusters were apparent: chimaerids, rays, sharks and teleosts. Species within genera invariably clustered, and generally so did genera within families. Three taxonomic groups-dogfishes of the genus Squalus, flatheads of the family Platycephalidae, and tunas of the genus Thunnus-were examined more closely. The clades revealed after bootstrapping generally corresponded well with expectations. Individuals from operational taxonomic units designated as Squalus species B through F formed individual clades, supporting morphological evidence for each of these being separate species. We conclude that cox1 sequencing, or 'barcoding', can be used to identify fish species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.