Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16213670›Full record

ArticleFEMS microbiology letters2005

Construction of the first shuttle vectors for gene cloning and homologous recombination in Mycoplasma agalactiae.

Rohini Chopra-Dewasthaly, Marc Marenda, Renate Rosengarten, Wolfgang Jechlinger, Christine Citti

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEMS microbiology letters, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Development ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Targeted chromosomal knockouts in Mycoplasma pneumoniae.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2010
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rohini Chopra-DewasthalyInstitute of Bacteriology, Mycology and Hygiene, Department of Pathobiology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, A-1210 Vienna, Austria.
Marc Marenda
Renate Rosengarten
Wolfgang Jechlinger
Christine Citti
University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · ATÉcole Normale Supérieure - PSL · FR

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 21796Austrian Science Fund FWF P 23595
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mycoplasma agalactiae is a worldwide ruminant pathogen that causes significant economic losses by inflicting contagious agalactia in sheep and goats. The development of efficient control strategies requires a better understanding of the mycoplasma factors that promote successful infection. However, lack of genetic tools has been a major impediment in studying the pathogenic mechanisms of M. agalactiae. This study describes the identification and cloning of the M. agalactiae origin of replication (oriC) in order to construct the first shuttle vectors for targeted gene disruption, gene complementation and expression studies. Additionally, this report provides the first evidence of the occurrence of homologous recombination and the functionality of heterologous tetM determinant in this pathogen.

Indexed as

Genetic VectorsBase SequenceCloning, MolecularDNA, BacterialElectroporationGenes, BacterialGenetic Complementation TestGenetic TechniquesGenomic InstabilityMycoplasma agalactiaeRecombination, GeneticReplication OriginDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID16213670
PMCPMC6485543
OpenAlexW2080717250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.