Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16212851›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2005

Treatment of anxiety disorders in primary care practice: a randomised controlled trial.

Christine A van Boeijen, Patricia van Oppen, Anton J L M van Balkom, Sako Visser, Pieter T Kempe, Nettie Blankenstein, Richard van Dyck

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Counselling for mental health and psychosocial problems in primary care.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Psychological therapies for generalised anxiety disorder.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2007
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Panic Disorder in Primary Care.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2019
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Incentives and disincentives for the treatment of depression and anxiety: a scoping review.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2014
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Panic disorder.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2006
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christine A van BoeijenDepartment of Psychiatry, VU University Medical Centre, GGZ Buitenamstel, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Patricia van Oppen
Anton J L M van Balkom
Sako Visser
Pieter T Kempe
Nettie Blankenstein
Richard van Dyck

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnxiety disorders are prevalent in primary care. Psychological treatment is effective but time-consuming, and there are waiting lists for secondary care. Interest has therefore grown in developing guidelines for treatment that would be feasible in primary care.

aimTo compare the effectiveness and feasibility of guided self-help, the Anxiety Disorder Guidelines of the Netherlands College of General Practitioners and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT). DESIGN OF STUDY: Randomised controlled study lasting 12 weeks with follow-up at 3 and 9 months for primary care patients with panic disorder and/or generalised anxiety disorder.

settingThe first two forms of treatment were carried out by 46 GPs who were randomly assigned to one or the other form. CBT was carried out by cognitive behaviour therapists in a psychiatric outpatient clinic.

methodParticipants (n = 154) were randomly assigned to one of the three forms of treatment. The main outcome measure used was the state subscale of the Spielberger Anxiety Inventory.

resultsAll three forms of treatment gave significant improvement between pre-test and post-test, and this improvement remained stable between post-test and the follow-ups. The results obtained with the three treatment forms did not differ significantly over time. The feasibility of the Anxiety Disorder Guidelines was low compared with that of guided self-help.

conclusionOur results indicate that primary care patients with prevalent anxiety disorders for whom the GP does not find referral necessary can be adequately treated by the GP. Psychiatric outpatient clinic referral does not give superior results. Guided self-help is easier for the GP to carry out than a less highly-structured treatment like that laid down in the Anxiety Disorder Guidelines.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnxiety DisordersAttitude of Health PersonnelCognitive Behavioral TherapyFamily PracticeFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSelf CareTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID16212851
PMCPMC1562341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.