Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16212700›Full record

ArticleVisual neuroscience

Toward a unified model of vertebrate rod phototransduction.

R D Hamer, S C Nicholas, D Tranchina, T D Lamb, J L P Jarvinen

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Visual neuroscience. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Connectome of a human foveal retina.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Low signaling efficiency from receptor to effector in olfactory transduction: A quantified ligand-triggered GPCR pathway.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  6. Light responses of mammalian cones.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2021
    Review
  7. Temporal vision: measures, mechanisms and meaning.The Journal of experimental biology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

R D HamerSmith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA. russ@ski.org
S C Nicholas
D Tranchina
T D Lamb
J L P Jarvinen
Australian National University · AUSmith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute · USNew York University · US

Funding

COMPUTATIONAL ANALYSIS OF PHOTOTRANSDUCTIONR01EY011513 · NEI · SMITH-KETTLEWELL EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI HAMER, RUSSELL D · 1997 to 2005
$1.1M
NEI NIH HHS EY115-13NEI NIH HHS R01 EY011513-06NEI NIH HHS R01 EY011513-06S1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, we introduced a phototransduction model that was able to account for the reproducibility of vertebrate rod single-photon responses (SPRs) (Hamer et al., 2003). The model was able to reproduce SPR statistics by means of stochastic activation and inactivation of rhodopsin (R*), transducin (G alpha ), and phosphodiesterase (PDE). The features needed to capture the SPR statistics were (1) multiple steps of R* inactivation by means of multiple phosphorylations (followed by arrestin capping) and (2) phosphorylation dependence of the affinity between R* and the three molecules competing to bind with R* (G alpha, arrestin, and rhodopsin kinase). The model was also able to account for several other rod response features in the dim-flash regime, including SPRs obtained from rods in which various elements of the cascade have been genetically disabled or disrupted. However, the model was not tested under high light-level conditions. We sought to evaluate the extent to which the multiple phosphorylation model could simultaneously account for single-photon response behavior, as well as responses to high light levels causing complete response saturation and/or significant light adaptation (LA). To date no single model, with one set of parameters, has been able to do this. Dim-flash responses and statistics were simulated using a hybrid stochastic/deterministic model and Monte-Carlo methods as in Hamer et al. (2003). A dark-adapted flash series, and stimulus paradigms from the literature eliciting various degrees of light adaptation (LA), were simulated using a full differential equation version of the model that included the addition of Ca2+-feedback onto rhodopsin kinase via recoverin. With this model, using a single set of parameters, we attempted to account for (1) SPR waveforms and statistics (as in Hamer et al., 2003); (2) a full dark-adapted flash-response series, from dim flash to saturating, bright flash levels, from a toad rod; (3) steady-state LA responses, including LA circulating current (as in Koutalos et al., 1995) and LA flash sensitivity measured in rods from four species; (4) step responses from newt rods ( Forti et al., 1989) over a large dynamic range; (5) dynamic LA responses, such as the step-flash paradigm of Fain et al. (1989), and the two-flash paradigm of Murnick and Lamb (1996); and (6) the salient response features from four knockout rod preparations. The model was able to meet this stringent test, accounting for almost all the salient qualitative, and many quantitative features, of the responses across this broad array of stimulus conditions, including SPR reproducibility. The model promises to be useful in testing hypotheses regarding both normal and abnormal photoreceptor function, and is a good starting point for development of a full-range model of cone phototransduction. Informative limitations of the model are also discussed.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAdaptation, OcularAnimalsCalcium SignalingComputer SimulationDark AdaptationFeedbackG-Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 1Monte Carlo MethodPeptides, CyclicPhosphoric Diester HydrolasesPhosphorylationPhotic StimulationReproducibility of ResultsRetinal Rod Photoreceptor CellsRhodopsinG-Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 1Peptides, CyclicPhosphoric Diester HydrolasesrhodopeptinRhodopsin

Identifiers

PMID16212700
PMCPMC1482458
OpenAlexW2166571796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.