Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16211521›Full record

ArticleJournal of structural and functional genomics2005

Shotgun crystallization strategy for structural genomics II: crystallization conditions that produce high resolution structures for T. maritima proteins.

Rebecca Page, Ashley M Deacon, Scott A Lesley, Raymond C Stevens

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of structural and functional genomics, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Autoindexing the diffraction patterns from crystals with a pseudotranslation.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography · 2009
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Image-based crystal detection: a machine-learning approach.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography · 2008
    Article
  7. On the relevance of defining protein structures in cancer research.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2008
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca PageJoint Center for Structural Genomics, USA.
Ashley M Deacon
Scott A Lesley
Raymond C Stevens
Joint Center for Structural Genomics · USGenomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation · USStanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource · US

Funding

JOINT CENTER FOR STRUCTURAL GENOMICSP50GM062411 · NIGMS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI WILSON, IAN A · 2000 to 2004
$32.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM62411
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, 119 high resolution structures of Thermotoga maritima proteins have been determined by the Joint Center for Structural Genomics (JCSG, www.jcsg.org). Sixty-seven of these were solved using the first implementation of the multi-tiered crystallization strategy at the JCSG for the efficient crystallization of large numbers of protein targets. Previously, we reported the analysis of all proteins crystallized using this multi-tiered strategy [Lesley, S.A. et al. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 11664-11669; Page, R. et al. (2003) Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 59, 1028-1037]. Here, we extend the analysis and describe the crystallization characteristics of those proteins that produced diffraction quality crystals, ultimately resulting in high resolution structures. First, we found that over 77% (52) of the crystals used for structure determination were produced directly from high-throughput coarse screens, indicating that less than one quarter of the crystals (15) required fine screening. In addition, as observed for the proteome screen [Page, R. et al. (2003) Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 59, 1028-1037], the majority of conditions that produced crystals for natively expressed proteins, whose structures have been determined, were distinct from those of their more extensively purified and selenomethionine-labeled counterparts. Finally, 99% of the proteins whose structures were solved crystallized in conditions contained in the JCSG Minimal Core Screen [Page, R. et al. (2003) Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 59, 1028-1037; Page, R. and Stevens, R.C. (2004) Methods 34, 373-389], a set of 67 conditions previously identified as those most likely to produce crystals of a diverse set of proteins, confirming its success for rapid identification of proteins with a natural propensity to crystallize.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsCrystallizationProteomicsThermotoga maritimaBacterial Proteins

Identifiers

PMID16211521
OpenAlexW1971983296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.