Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16211086›Full record

ReviewCancer gene therapy2006

Gene therapy with drug resistance genes.

M Zaboikin, N Srinivasakumar, F Schuening

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer gene therapy, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Advances in HIV Gene Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Gene therapy in head and neck cancer: a review.Postgraduate medical journal · 2007
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M ZaboikinDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
N Srinivasakumar
F Schuening

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major side effect of cancer chemotherapy is myelosuppression. Expression of drug-resistance genes in hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) using gene transfer methodologies holds the promise of overcoming marrow toxicity in cancer chemotherapy. Adequate protection of marrow cells in cancer patients from myelotoxicity in this way would permit the use of escalating doses of chemotherapy for eradicating residual disease. A second use of drug-resistance genes is for coexpression with a therapeutic gene in HSCs to provide a selection advantage to gene-modified cells. In this review, we discuss several drug resistance genes, which are well suited for in vivo selection as well as other newer candidate genes with potential for use in this manner.

Indexed as

Genetic TherapyTransgenesAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1Drug Resistance, NeoplasmGene Transfer TechniquesHematopoietic Stem CellsHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansNeoplasmsO(6)-Methylguanine-DNA MethyltransferaseTetrahydrofolate DehydrogenaseAntineoplastic AgentsATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1O(6)-Methylguanine-DNA MethyltransferaseTetrahydrofolate Dehydrogenase

Identifiers

PMID16211086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.