Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16210488›Full record

ArticleClinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology2005

Evaluation of LIAISON Treponema Screen, a novel recombinant antigen-based chemiluminescence immunoassay for laboratory diagnosis of syphilis.

Antonella Marangoni, Vittorio Sambri, Silvia Accardo, Francesca Cavrini, Antonietta D'Antuono, Alessandra Moroni, Elisa Storni, Roberto Cevenini

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Sensitivity and Specificity of Treponemal-specific Tests for the Diagnosis of Syphilis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. The Traditional or Reverse Algorithm for Diagnosis of Syphilis: Pros and Cons.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. CDC Laboratory Recommendations for Syphilis Testing, United States, 2024.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Clinical Evaluation of Fully Automated ElecsysJournal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The endemic treponematoses.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2014
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Laboratory diagnosis of syphilis with automated immunoassays.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2009
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Antonella MarangoniMicrobiology Section, DMCSS, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Vittorio Sambri
Silvia Accardo
Francesca Cavrini
Antonietta D'Antuono
Alessandra Moroni
Elisa Storni
Roberto Cevenini

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of LIAISON Treponema Screen (DiaSorin, Saluggia, Italy), a new automated chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA), in comparison with that of rapid plasma reagin (RPR) and the following currently used treponemal tests: hemagglutination test (TPHA), immunoenzymatic assay (EIA), and Western blot (WB). First, a retrospective study was performed with a panel of 2,494 blood donor sera, a panel of 131 clinical and serologically characterized syphilitic sera, and 96 samples obtained from subjects with potentially interfering diseases or conditions. A prospective study was also performed by testing 1,800 unselected samples submitted to the Microbiology Laboratory of the St. Orsola Hospital in Bologna, Italy, for routine screening for syphilis. As expected, RPR was the least specific method, especially when potentially cross-reacting sera were tested. On the contrary, all of the treponemal tests proved to be very specific (99.9%) and they performed with the following sensitivities: 100% (WB), 99.2% (CLIA), 95.4% (EIA), and 94.7% (TPHA).

Indexed as

Antigens, BacterialCross ReactionsHumansImmunoassayLuminescent MeasurementsRecombinant ProteinsSensitivity and SpecificitySyphilisSyphilis SerodiagnosisTreponemaAntigens, BacterialRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID16210488
PMCPMC1247834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.