Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16207985›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2005

Comparison of results of voriconazole disk diffusion testing for Candida species with results from a central reference laboratory in the ARTEMIS global antifungal surveillance program.

M A Pfaller, L Boyken, S A Messer, S Tendolkar, R J Hollis, D J Diekema

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Diagnosis and Treatment Challenges ofCase reports in infectious diseases · 2024
    Article
  4. Antifungal Susceptibility Testing: Current Approaches.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2020
    Review
  5. Nosocomial candidiasis in Rio de Janeiro State: Distribution and fluconazole susceptibility profile.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2015
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Oropharyngeal candidiasis in the era of antiretroviral therapy.Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics · 2010
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M A PfallerDepartment of Pathology, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA. michael-pfaller@uiowa.edu
L Boyken
S A Messer
S Tendolkar
R J Hollis
D J Diekema

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accuracy of antifungal susceptibility testing is important for reliable resistance surveillance and for the clinical management of patients with serious infections. Our primary objective was to compare the results of voriconazole disk diffusion testing of Candida spp. performed by centers participating in the ARTEMIS program with disk diffusion and MIC results obtained by the central reference laboratory. A total of 2,934 isolates of Candida spp. were tested by CLSI disk diffusion and reference broth microdilution methods in the central reference laboratory. These results were compared to the results of disk diffusion testing performed in the 54 participating centers. All tests were performed and interpreted following CLSI recommendations, as follows: susceptible (S), MIC of <or=1 microg/ml (>or=17 mm); susceptible dose dependent (SDD), MIC of 2 microg/ml (14 to 16 mm); and resistant (R), MIC of >or=4 microg/ml (<or=13 mm). The overall categorical agreement between participant disk diffusion test results and reference laboratory MIC results was 94.1%, with 0.1% very major errors (VME) and 3.4% major errors (ME). The categorical agreement between disk diffusion test results obtained in the reference laboratory and the MIC test results was 99.0%. Likewise, good agreement was observed between participant disk diffusion test results and reference laboratory disk diffusion test results, with an agreement of 93.8%, 0.2% VME, and 3.4% ME. The disk diffusion test was reliable for detecting those isolates of Candida spp. that were characterized as resistant (MIC of >or=4 microg/ml) by MIC testing. External quality assurance data obtained by surveillance programs such as the ARTEMIS Global Antifungal Surveillance Program ensure the generation of useful surveillance data and result in the continued improvement of antifungal susceptibility testing practices.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsCandidaDrug Resistance, FungalHumansLaboratoriesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPopulation SurveillancePyrimidinesQuality ControlTriazolesVoriconazoleAntifungal AgentsPyrimidinesTriazolesVoriconazole

Identifiers

PMID16207985
PMCPMC1248491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.