Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16207966›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2005

Two-year evaluation of Borrelia burgdorferi culture and supplemental tests for definitive diagnosis of Lyme disease.

Peggy Coulter, Clara Lema, Diane Flayhart, Amy S Linhardt, John N Aucott, Paul G Auwaerter, J Stephen Dumler

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Molecular detection of Spirochetes andOpen veterinary journal · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Colocalization of Radicular Pain and Erythema Migrans in Patients With Bannwarth Syndrome Suggests a Direct Spread of Borrelia Into the Central Nervous System.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Detection of IFN-γ Secretion in Blood Samples Collected Before and After Treatment of Varying Stages of Lyme Disease.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi Cell-free DNA in Human Plasma Samples for Improved Diagnosis of Early Lyme Borreliosis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Article
  12. Laboratory Diagnosis of Lyme Borreliosis.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Lyme Disease Frontiers: ReconcilingPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  17. Direct Diagnostic Tests for Lyme Disease.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Peggy CoulterDivision of Medical Microbiology, Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Clara Lema
Diane Flayhart
Amy S Linhardt
John N Aucott
Paul G Auwaerter
J Stephen Dumler
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lyme disease is usually diagnosed and treated based on clinical manifestations. However, laboratory testing is useful for patients with confusing presentations and for validation of disease in clinical studies. Although cultivation of Borrelia burgdorferi is definitive, prior investigations have shown that no single test is optimal for Lyme disease diagnosis. We applied high-volume blood culture, skin biopsy culture, PCR, and serodiagnosis to a cohort of patients with suspected Lyme disease acquired in Maryland and southern Pennsylvania. The study was performed to confirm the relative utility of culture and to identify laboratory testing algorithms that will supplement clinical diagnosis. Overall, 30 of 86 patients (35%) were culture positive, whereas an additional 15 of 84 (18%) were seropositive only (51% total sero- and culture positive), and PCR on skin biopsy identified 4 additional patients who were neither culture nor seropositive. Among 49 laboratory test-positive patients, the highest sensitivity (100%) for diagnosis was obtained when culture, skin PCR, and serologic tests were used, although serologic testing with skin PCR was almost as sensitive (92%). Plasma PCR was infrequently positive and provided no additional diagnostic value. Although culture is definitive and has a relatively high sensitivity, the results required a mean of 3.5 weeks to recovery. The combination of acute-phase serology and skin PCR was 75% sensitive, offering a practical and relatively rapid alternative for confirming clinical impression. The full battery of tests could be useful for patients with confusing clinical signs or for providing strong laboratory support for clinical studies of Lyme disease.

Indexed as

Borrelia burgdorferiAlgorithmsAntibodies, BacterialBacteriological TechniquesBiopsyBloodCulture MediaHumansLyme DiseasePolymerase Chain ReactionSkinAntibodies, BacterialCulture Media

Identifiers

PMID16207966
PMCPMC1248466
OpenAlexW2144344136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.