Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16207964›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2005

Contemporary methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones in Hong Kong.

Margaret Ip, R W H Yung, T K Ng, W K Luk, Cindy Tse, Philip Hung, Mark Enright, Donald J Lyon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. TheGenes · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Emergence and spread of worldwideInfection and drug resistance · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Human Infections with Staphylococcus aureus CC398.Current environmental health reports · 2015
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Short term micro-evolution and PCR-detection of methicillin-resistant and -susceptible Staphylococcus aureus sequence type 398.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2010
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Margaret IpChinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong. margaretip@cuhk.edu.hk
R W H Yung
T K Ng
W K Luk
Cindy Tse
Philip Hung
Mark Enright
Donald J Lyon
Prince of Wales Hospital · CNChinese University of Hong Kong · CNPamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital · CNTseung Kwan O Hospital · CNUniversity of Bath · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two hundred non-duplicate methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates causing bacteremia in patients in four major Hong Kong hospitals during the period 2000 to 2001 were characterized by antibiogram, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) using SmaI restriction enzymes, and determination of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) types. Nine PFGE types, A to I, were obtained. PFGE type A constituted 50% (99/200) of all isolates and was present in isolates from all four hospitals. PFGE types A to E, had previously been identified as the major types at one of the hospitals from 1988 to 2000. The majority had a resistance profile to tetracycline (T), erythromycin (E), clindamycin (D), gentamicin (G), tobramycin (To), and ciprofloxacin (Ci), and belonged to SCCmec type III; and representatives belonged to clonal complex 239 (CC 239) (MRSA with SCCmec type III and sequence type 239, designated ST 239-MRSA-III). PFGE types F to I were new patterns that had not been previously identified in isolates from Hong Kong. PFGE type F constituted 18% (35/200) of MRSAs, had resistance profile TEGToCi, and belonged to CC 5 (ST 5-MRSA-II). PFGE type G included 13% (26/200) of MRSAs, had resistance profile TECi, and belonged to CC 45 with SCCmec type I or II. PFGE type H had characteristics similar to those of CC 239, while PFGE type I included three isolates, two of which expressed resistance to oxacillin and fusidic acid only. Two of these strains had SCCmec IVa and carried sequence type 389, with a multilocus sequence typing allelic profile of 3-35-19-2-20-26-39. Contemporary MRSAs causing bacteremia in Hong Kong hospitals belong to three clonal complexes (CC 5, CC 45, and CC 239). The most prevalent MRSA clone in Hong Kong belongs to CC 239, with PFGE types A to E and H, SCCmec type III, ST 239, and a resistance profile of TEDGToCi.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaBacterial ProteinsBacterial Typing TechniquesDeoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-SpecificDNA, BacterialElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldHong KongHospitals, UrbanHumansMethicillin ResistanceMicrobial Sensitivity TestsStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsCCCGGG-specific type II deoxyribonucleasesDeoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-SpecificDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID16207964
PMCPMC1248494
OpenAlexW2097749530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.