Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16207956›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2005

Variability of Clostridium difficile surface proteins and specific serum antibody response in patients with Clostridium difficile-associated disease.

Séverine Péchiné, Claire Janoir, Anne Collignon

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Toxins · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Immunization Strategies Against Clostridioides difficile.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Non-Toxin-BasedPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Frontiers in antibiotic alternatives forWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2021
    Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Host Immune Responses toFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. TargetingFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Séverine PéchinéUniversité de Paris-Sud, Faculté de Pharmacie, Département de Microbiologie, 5 rue JB Clément, F-92296 Chātenay-Malabry cedex, France.
Claire Janoir
Anne Collignon
Université Paris-Sud · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pathogen attachment is a crucial early step in mucosal infections. This step is mediated by important virulence factors, such as surface proteins. Clostridium difficile surface proteins have been identified as (i) adhesins (the flagellar cap protein FliD; the flagellin FliC; and the cell wall protein Cwp 66 with a two domain-structure [Cw 66 N-terminal and Cwp 66 C-terminal domains]) and (ii) protease (the Cwp 84 protein). To address the roles of these proteins in the pathogenesis of Clostridium difficile and to identify vaccine antigen candidates, we analyzed the variability of the proteins and their immunogenicities in 17 patients with C. difficile-associated disease. PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of amplified gene products revealed interstrain homogeneity with fliC and fliD, in contrast to cwp 66 genes. Immunoblot analysis showed that FliC and FliD were detected in the majority of isolates. The N-terminal domain of Cwp 66 and Cwp 84 were present in all strains tested, in contrast to the Cwp 66 C-terminal domain, the expression of which was heterogeneous. The 17 sera from the corresponding patients were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to detect antibodies directed against these proteins. Many patients developed antibodies to FliC, FliD, Cwp 84, and the Cwp 66 C-terminal domain, but not to the Cwp 66 N-terminal domain. In conclusion, this study confirms the expression of these surface proteins of C. difficile during the course of the disease. In addition, the FliC, FliD, and Cwp 84 proteins appeared to be good potential vaccine candidates.

Indexed as

Antibody SpecificityGenetic VariationAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialBacterial ProteinsClostridioides difficileEnterocolitis, PseudomembranousFlagellinGenotypeHumansMembrane ProteinsMicePhenotypePolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthRibotypingAntibodies, BacterialBacterial ProteinsFlagellinMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID16207956
PMCPMC1248434
OpenAlexW2052149039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.