Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16207358›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2005

Explicit equilibrium modeling of transcription-factor binding and gene regulation.

Joshua A Granek, Neil D Clarke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cooperative kinetics of ligand binding to linear polymers.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Quantifying the Impact of Non-coding Variants on Transcription Factor-DNA Binding.Research in computational molecular biology : ... Annual International Conference, RECOMB ... : proceedings. RECOMB (Conference : 2005- ) · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joshua A GranekDepartment of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. jgranek@jhmi.edu
Neil D Clarke

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have developed a computational model that predicts the probability of transcription factor binding to any site in the genome. GOMER (generalizable occupancy model of expression regulation) calculates binding probabilities on the basis of position weight matrices, and incorporates the effects of cooperativity and competition by explicit calculation of coupled binding equilibria. GOMER can be used to test hypotheses regarding gene regulation that build upon this physically principled prediction of protein-DNA binding.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationModels, GeneticBinding, CompetitiveChromatin ImmunoprecipitationDNA-Binding ProteinsForkhead Transcription FactorsGenes, cdcNuclear ProteinsOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPromoter Regions, GeneticProtein BindingRepressor ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTranscription FactorsDNA-Binding ProteinsForkhead Transcription FactorsNDT80 protein, S cerevisiaeNuclear ProteinsRepressor ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSUM1 protein, S cerevisiaeTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID16207358
PMCPMC1257470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.