Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16205841›Full record

ReviewJournal of muscle research and cell motility2005

Length-dependent Ca(2+) activation in cardiac muscle: some remaining questions.

Franklin Fuchs, Donald A Martyn

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of muscle research and cell motility, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cardiac Sarcomere Signaling in Health and Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Stress-dependent activation of myosin in the heart requires thin filament activation and thick filament mechanosensing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Sarcomere length-dependent effects on CaThe Journal of general physiology · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Franklin FuchsDepartment of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
Donald A Martyn

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The steep relationship between systolic force and end diastolic volume in cardiac muscle (Frank-Starling relation) is, to a large extent, based on length-dependent changes in myofilament Ca(2+) sensitivity. How sarcomere length modulates Ca(2+) sensitivity is still a topic of active investigation. Two general themes have emerged in recent years. On the one hand, there is a large body of evidence indicating that length-dependent changes in lattice spacing determine changes in Ca(2+) sensitivity for a given set of conditions. A model has been put forward in which the number of strong-binding cross-bridges that are formed is directly related to the proximity of the myosin heads to binding sites on actin. On the other hand, there is also a body of evidence suggesting that lattice spacing and Ca(2+) sensitivity are not tightly linked and that there is a length-sensing element in the sarcomere, which can modulate actin-myosin interactions independent of changes in lattice spacing. In this review, we examine the evidence that has been cited in support of these viewpoints. Much recent progress has been based on the combination of mechanical measurements with X-ray diffraction analysis of lattice spacing and cross-bridge interaction with actin. Compelling evidence indicates that the relationship between sarcomere length and lattice spacing is influenced by the elastic properties of titin and that changes in lattice spacing directly modulate cross-bridge interactions with thin filaments. However, there is also evidence that the precise relationship between Ca(2+) sensitivity and lattice spacing can be altered by changes in protein isoform expression, protein phosphorylation, modifiers of cross-bridge kinetics, and changes in titin compliance. Hence although there is no unique relationship between Ca(2+) sensitivity and lattice spacing the evidence strongly suggests that under any given set of physiological circumstances variation in lattice spacing is the major determinant of length-dependent changes in Ca(2+) sensitivity.

Indexed as

AnimalsCalciumHumansMuscle ProteinsMyocardial ContractionMyocardiumSarcomeresX-Ray DiffractionCalciumMuscle Proteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.