Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16204541›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2005

Genomic diversity of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter jejuni isolates recovered from free-range broiler farms and comparison with isolates of various origins.

K Rivoal, C Ragimbeau, G Salvat, P Colin, G Ermel

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Approaches to prevent and control Campylobacter spp. colonization in broiler chickens: a review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Review
  8. Longitudinal Study of the Distribution of Antimicrobial-ResistantAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Comparison of PCR-RFLP and PFGE for determining the clonality ofSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Effect of Feed Additives on Productivity andFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Scientific Opinion onEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K RivoalUnité Hygiène et Qualité des Produits Avicoles et Porcins, Agence Française de Sécurité des Aliments, BP 53, F-22 440 Ploufragan, France. k.rivoal@ploufragan.afssa.fr
C Ragimbeau
G Salvat
P Colin
G Ermel
Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l’Alimentation, de l’Environnement et du Travail · FRUniversité de Rennes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many industrialized countries, the incidence of campylobacteriosis exceeds that of salmonellosis. Campylobacter bacteria are transmitted to humans mainly in food, especially poultry meat products. Total prevention of Campylobacter colonization in broiler flocks is the best way to reduce (or eliminate) the contamination of poultry products. The aim of this study was to establish the sources and routes of contamination of broilers at the farm level. Molecular typing methods (DNA macrorestriction pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and analysis of gene polymorphism by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism) were used to characterize isolates collected from seven broiler farms. The relative genomic diversity of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter jejuni was determined. Analysis of the similarity among 116 defined genotypes was used to determine clusters within the two species. Furthermore, evidence of recombination suggested that there were genomic rearrangements within the Campylobacter populations. Recovery of related clusters from different broiler farms showed that some Campylobacter strains might be specifically adapted to poultry. Analysis of the Campylobacter cluster distribution on three broiler farms showed that soil in the area around the poultry house was a potential source of Campylobacter contamination. The broilers were infected by Campylobacter spp. between days 15 and 36 during rearing, and the type of contamination changed during the rearing period. A study of the effect of sanitary barriers showed that the chickens stayed Campylobacter spp. free until they had access to the open area. They were then rapidly colonized by the Campylobacter strains isolated from the soil.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAnimal HusbandryAnimalsBacterial Typing TechniquesCampylobacter coliCampylobacter InfectionsCampylobacter jejuniCattleChickensDNA Restriction EnzymesElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldGenome, BacterialHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthPoultry DiseasesDNA Restriction Enzymes

Identifiers

PMID16204541
PMCPMC1266014
OpenAlexW2165531695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.