Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16204208›Full record

ArticleGenetics2006

Evidence for a selective sweep in the wapl region of Drosophila melanogaster.

Steffen Beisswanger, Wolfgang Stephan, David De Lorenzo

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Population Genomics on the Fly: Recent Advances in Drosophila.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2020
    Review
  4. Background selection as null hypothesis in population genomics: insights and challenges fromPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Genetic hitchhiking versus background selection: the controversy and its implications.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2010
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Evidence that strong positive selection drives neofunctionalization in the tandemly duplicated polyhomeotic genes in Drosophila.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2008
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Steffen BeisswangerSection of Evolutionary Biology, Department of Biology II, University of Munich, D-82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany. beisswanger@zi.biologie.uni-muenchen.de
Wolfgang Stephan
David De Lorenzo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A scan of the X chromosome of a European Drosophila melanogaster population revealed evidence for the recent action of positive directional selection at individual loci. In this study we analyze one such region that showed no polymorphism in the genome scan (located in cytological division 2C10-2E1). We detect a 60.5-kb stretch of DNA encompassing the genes ph-d, ph-p, CG3835, bcn92, Pgd, wapl, and Cyp4d1, which almost completely lacks variation in the European sample. Loci flanking this region show a skewed frequency spectrum at segregating sites, strong haplotype structure, and high levels of linkage disequilibrium. Neutrality tests reveal that these data are unlikely under both the neutral equilibrium model and the simple bottleneck scenarios. In contrast, newly developed maximum-likelihood ratio tests suggest that strong selection has acted recently on the region under investigation, causing a selective sweep. Evidence that this sweep may have originated in an ancestral population in Africa is presented.

Indexed as

GenomePolymorphism, GeneticSelection, GeneticAfricaAnimalsChromosome SegregationDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEuropeGeographyHaplotypesLinkage DisequilibriumX ChromosomeDrosophila Proteins

Identifiers

PMID16204208
PMCPMC1456153
OpenAlexW2156978282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.