Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16204190›Full record

ArticleGenome research2005

Evolutionary constraints in conserved nongenic sequences of mammals.

Peter D Keightley, Gregory V Kryukov, Shamil Sunyaev, Daniel L Halligan, Daniel J Gaffney

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Cis-regulatory elements and human evolution.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2014
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The genetics of inbreeding depression.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2009
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Power of deep, all-exon resequencing for discovery of human trait genes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2009
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Fast evolution of core promoters in primate genomes.Molecular biology and evolution · 2008
    Article
  15. Life-history traits drive the evolutionary rates of mammalian coding and noncoding genomic elements.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2007
    Article
  16. Article
  17. The other side of the nearly neutral theory, evidence of slightly advantageous back-mutations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2007
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Widely distributed noncoding purifying selection in the human genome.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Peter D KeightleyInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, United Kingdom. keightley.gr2005@spambob.net
Gregory V Kryukov
Shamil Sunyaev
Daniel L Halligan
Daniel J Gaffney
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USUniversity of Edinburgh · GBInstitut de Biologia Evolutiva · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mammalian genomes contain many highly conserved nongenic sequences (CNGs) whose functional significance is poorly understood. Sets of CNGs have previously been identified by selecting the most conserved elements from a chromosome or genome, but in these highly selected samples, conservation may be unrelated to purifying selection. Furthermore, conservation of CNGs may be caused by mutation rate variation rather than selective constraints. To account for the effect of selective sampling, we have examined conservation of CNGs in taxa whose evolution is largely independent of the taxa from which the CNGs were initially identified, and we have controlled for mutation rate variation in the genome. We show that selective constraints in CNGs and their flanks are about one-half as strong in hominids as in murids, implying that hominids have accumulated many slightly deleterious mutations in functionally important nongenic regions. This is likely to be a consequence of the low effective population size of hominids leading to a reduced effectiveness of selection. We estimate that there are one and two times as many conserved nucleotides in CNGs as in known protein-coding genes of hominids and murids, respectively. Polymorphism frequencies in CNGs indicate that purifying selection operates in these sequences. During hominid evolution, we estimate that a total of about three deleterious mutations in CNGs and protein-coding genes have been selectively eliminated per diploid genome each generation, implying that deleterious mutations are eliminated from populations non-independently and that sex is necessary for long-term population persistence.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionConserved SequenceAnimalsBase SequenceMammalsMutationPolymorphism, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID16204190
PMCPMC1240079
OpenAlexW2015105137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.