Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16203978›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2005

EVOPRINTER, a multigenomic comparative tool for rapid identification of functionally important DNA.

Ward F Odenwald, Wayne Rasband, Alexander Kuzin, Thomas Brody

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Modular tissue-specific regulation ofDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ward F OdenwaldNeural Cell-Fate Determinants Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. ward@codon.nih.gov
Wayne Rasband
Alexander Kuzin
Thomas Brody
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Analysis of Neural Precursor Cell cis-Regulatory EnhancersZIANS002820 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI ODENWALD, WARD F · 2010 to 2017
$5.3M
Gene Regulatory Networks Controlling CNS DevelopmentZ01NS002820 · NINDS · NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI ODENWALD, WARD F · 1990 to 2008
$2.5M
Analysis Of Gene Expression Regulatory Networks Controlling CNS DevelopmentZIHNS002820 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI ODENWALD, WARD F · 2009 to 2009
$1.2M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here, we describe a multigenomic DNA sequence-analysis tool, evoprinter, that facilitates the rapid identification of evolutionary conserved sequences within the context of a single species. The evoprinter output identifies multispecies-conserved DNA sequences as they exist in a reference DNA. This identification is accomplished by superimposing multiple reference DNA vs. test-genome pairwise blat (blast-like alignment tool) readouts of the reference DNA to identify conserved nucleotides that are shared by all orthologous DNAs. evoprinter analysis of well characterized genes reveals that most, if not all, of the conserved sequences are essential for gene function. For example, analysis of orthologous genes that are shared by many vertebrates identifies conserved DNA in both protein-encoding sequences and noncoding cis-regulatory regions, including enhancers and mRNA microRNA binding sites. In Drosophila, the combined mutational histories of five or more species affords near-base pair resolution of conserved transcription factor DNA-binding sites, and essential amino acids are revealed by the nucleotide flexibility of their codon-wobble position(s). Conserved small peptide-encoding genes, which had been undetected by conventional gene-prediction algorithms, are identified by the codon-wobble signatures of invariant amino acids. Also, evoprinter allows one to assess the degree of evolutionary divergence between orthologous DNAs by highlighting differences between a selected species and the other test species.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsCodonComputational BiologyConserved SequenceDNADNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsGenes, EssentialGenomicsMolecular Sequence DataSequence Analysis, DNATranscription Factorsac protein, DrosophilaBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsCodonDNADNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila Proteinssc protein, DrosophilaTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID16203978
PMCPMC1239946
OpenAlexW2061802413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.