Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16203258›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2005

Methodologic and logistic issues in conducting longitudinal birth cohort studies: lessons learned from the Centers for Children's Environmental Health and Disease Prevention Research.

Brenda Eskenazi, Eleanor A Gladstone, Gertrud S Berkowitz, Christina H Drew, Elaine M Faustman, Nina T Holland, Bruce Lanphear, Stefanie J Meisel, Frederica P Perera, Virginia A Rauh and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Brenda EskenaziCenter for Children's Environmental Health Research, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA. eskenazi@berkeley.edu
Eleanor A Gladstone
Gertrud S Berkowitz
Christina H Drew
Elaine M Faustman
Nina T Holland
Bruce Lanphear
Stefanie J Meisel
Frederica P Perera
Virginia A Rauh
Anne Sweeney
Robin M Whyatt
Kimberly Yolton
Center for Children · USCenter for Environmental Health · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USUniversity of Washington · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

Project C: Epigenetic Effects of DDT/E and PBDEs on PubertyP01ES009605 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI ESKENAZI, BRENDA · 1999 to 2015
$11.2M
The Columbia Center for Children's Environmental HealthP01ES009600 · NIEHS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI PERERA, FREDERICA P · 1999 to 2014
$11.2M
STUDY OF CELLULAR &MOLECULAR ASPECTS OF PESTICIDE NEURODEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITYP01ES009601 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FAUSTMAN, ELAINE M · 1999 to 2013
$8.7M
PRENATAL PCB EXPOSURE &NEURODEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOMES IN ADOLESCENCE &ADULTHOODP01ES009584 · NIEHS · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF NYU · PI WOLFF, MARY S · 1999 to 2009
$7.3M
Study of Prevalent Neurotoxicants in ChildrenP01ES011261 · NIEHS · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI LANPHEAR, BRUCE P · 2001 to 2006
$6.4M
The Columbia Center for Children's Environmental HealthP50ES009600 · NIEHS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI PERERA, FREDERICA P · 2015 to 2018
$3.4M
Perinatal PCBs and neuropsychological /auditory functionP01ES011263 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI SCHANTZ, SUSAN L · 2001 to 2005
$2.8M
NIEHS NIH HHS ES009584NIEHS NIH HHS ES009600NIEHS NIH HHS ES009601NIEHS NIH HHS ES009605NIEHS NIH HHS ES011261NIEHS NIH HHS ES011263NIEHS NIH HHS P01 ES009584NIEHS NIH HHS P01 ES009600NIEHS NIH HHS P01 ES009601NIEHS NIH HHS P01 ES009605NIEHS NIH HHS P01 ES011261NIEHS NIH HHS P01 ES011263
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In anticipation of the National Children's Study, lessons can be learned from the smaller birth cohort studies conducted by five Centers for Children's Environmental Health and Disease Prevention Research funded by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The populations studied are diverse in ethnicity and social class and reside in urban and rural environments. Although almost all of the centers chose to enroll participants through medical care facilities, they had to develop independent staffs and structures because of the overburdened medical care system. Some of the lessons learned by the centers include the importance of continuous funding, building community partnerships to conduct culturally appropriate research, hiring bilingual and bicultural staff from the community, prioritizing research goals, developing biorepositories to ensure future utility of samples, instituting quality control procedures for all aspects of specimen and data collection, maintaining frequent contact with study participants, ensuring ethical conduct of the research in a changing medical-legal climate, and communicating results in a timely and appropriate manner to participants and the wider community. All centers underestimated the necessary start-up time, staff, and costs in conducting these birth cohort studies. Despite the logistical complexity and added expenses, all centers emphasize the importance of studying the impact of environmental exposures on those children most at risk, those living in minority and low-income communities. These centers present barriers encountered, solutions found, and considerations for future research, with the hope that the lessons learned can help inform the planning and conduct of the National Children's Study.

Indexed as

Child WelfareEnvironmental HealthAdolescentAdultChildChild DevelopmentCohort StudiesEnvironmentEthicsFemaleGrowthHumansLongitudinal StudiesMiddle AgedPregnancySocial Environment

Identifiers

PMID16203258
PMCPMC1281291
OpenAlexW2080105125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.