Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16202210›Full record

ReviewJournal of cellular and molecular medicine

Polyamines and apoptosis.

Nikolaus Seiler, Francis Raul

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 320 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Frontiers in immunology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Methyl Group Metabolism in Differentiation, Aging, and Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nikolaus SeilerLaboratory of Nutritional Cancer Prevention, Institut de Recherche Contre les Cancers de l'Appareil Digestif (IRCAD), Strasbourg Cedex, 67091, France. nikolaus.seiler@ircad.u-strasbg.fr
Francis Raul
Institut de Recherche contre les Cancers de l’Appareil Digestif · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The natural polyamines putrescine, spermidine and spermine are in multiple ways involved in cell growth and the maintenance of cell viability. In the course of the last 15 years more and more evidence hinted also at roles in gene regulation. It is therefore not surprising that the polyamines are involved in events inherent to genetically programmed cell death. Following inhibition of ornithine decarboxylase, a key step in polyamine biosynthesis, numerous links have been identified between the polyamines and apoptotic pathways. Examples of activation and prevention of apoptosis due to polyamine depletion are known for several cell lines. Elevation of polyamine concentrations may lead to apoptosis or to malignant transformation. These observations are discussed in the present review, together with possible mechanisms of action of the polyamines. Contradictory results and incomplete information blur the picture and complicate interpretation. Since, however, much interest is focussed at present on all aspects of programmed cell death, a considerable progress in the elucidation of polyamine functions in apoptotic signalling pathways is expected, even though enormous difficulties oppose pinpointing specific interactions of the polyamines with pro- and anti-apoptotic factors. Such situation is quite common in polyamine research.

Indexed as

AnimalsApoptosisCell SurvivalFree Radical ScavengersGrowth SubstancesHumansPolyaminesFree Radical ScavengersGrowth SubstancesPolyamines

Identifiers

PMID16202210
PMCPMC6741638
OpenAlexW1976909856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.