Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16201020›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2005

Vibrio cholerae infection of Drosophila melanogaster mimics the human disease cholera.

Nathan S Blow, Robert N Salomon, Kerry Garrity, Isabelle Reveillaud, Alan Kopin, F Rob Jackson, Paula I Watnick

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. microPublication biology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Insights into Carbapenem Resistance inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nathan S BlowDepartment of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Robert N Salomon
Kerry Garrity
Isabelle Reveillaud
Alan Kopin
F Rob Jackson
Paula I Watnick
Tufts Medical Center · USTufts University · US

Funding

PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDIESP30DK034928 · NIDDK · TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER · PI PLAUT, ANDREW GEORGE · 1986 to 2007
$8.5M
The fly as a natural and model host for vibrio choleraeR21AI064800 · NIAID · TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER · PI WATNICK, PAULA I · 2005 to 2006
$329k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI064800NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK034928
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cholera, the pandemic diarrheal disease caused by the gram-negative bacterium Vibrio cholerae, continues to be a major public health challenge in the developing world. Cholera toxin, which is responsible for the voluminous stools of cholera, causes constitutive activation of adenylyl cyclase, resulting in the export of ions into the intestinal lumen. Environmental studies have demonstrated a close association between V. cholerae and many species of arthropods including insects. Here we report the susceptibility of the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, to oral V. cholerae infection through a process that exhibits many of the hallmarks of human disease: (i) death of the fly is dependent on the presence of cholera toxin and is preceded by rapid weight loss; (ii) flies harboring mutant alleles of either adenylyl cyclase, Gsalpha, or the Gardos K channel homolog SK are resistant to V. cholerae infection; and (iii) ingestion of a K channel blocker along with V. cholerae protects wild-type flies against death. In mammals, ingestion of as little as 25 mug of cholera toxin results in massive diarrhea. In contrast, we found that ingestion of cholera toxin was not lethal to the fly. However, when cholera toxin was co-administered with a pathogenic strain of V. cholerae carrying a chromosomal deletion of the genes encoding cholera toxin, death of the fly ensued. These findings suggest that additional virulence factors are required for intoxication of the fly that may not be essential for intoxication of mammals. Furthermore, we demonstrate for the first time the mechanism of action of cholera toxin in a whole organism and the utility of D. melanogaster as an accurate, inexpensive model for elucidation of host susceptibility to cholera.

Identifiers

PMID16201020
PMCPMC1238743
OpenAlexW2057508404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.