Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16200205›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of clinical investigation2005

Give me A5 for lipoprotein hydrolysis!

Martin Merkel, Joerg Heeren

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReviewComment
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Current Diagnosis and Management of Primary Chylomicronemia.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Association of APOA5 T1131C polymorphism and risk of coronary artery disease.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martin MerkelDepartment of Internal Medicine and IBM II: Molecular Cell Biology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. merkel@uke.uni-hamburg.de
Joerg Heeren
Universität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

APOA5 is a newly identified apolipoprotein that plays a crucial role in the regulation of plasma triglyceride levels. In several human studies, common APOA5 single nucleotide polymorphisms have been strongly associated with elevated plasma triglyceride levels. In this issue of the JCI, Marçais et al. report that the rare Q139X mutation in APOA5 leads to severe hypertriglyceridemia by exerting a dominant-negative effect on the plasma lipolytic system for triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. The presented data support the idea that the molecular mechanism of APOA5 function may include the enhancement of binding between lipoproteins and proteoglycans at the vascular wall and activation of proteoglycan-bound lipoprotein lipase.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SubstitutionAnimalsApolipoprotein A-VApolipoproteinsApolipoproteins AEndothelium, VascularEnzyme ActivationHumansHydrolysisLipoprotein LipaseLipoproteinsPlasmaPoint MutationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProtein BindingProteoglycansAPOA5 protein, humanApolipoprotein A-VApolipoproteinsApolipoproteins ALipoprotein LipaseLipoproteinsProteoglycansTriglycerides

Identifiers

PMID16200205
PMCPMC1236705
OpenAlexW2145118099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.