Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16198765›Full record

SynthesisLancet (London, England)2005

Efficacy and effectiveness of influenza vaccines in elderly people: a systematic review.

T Jefferson, D Rivetti, A Rivetti, M Rudin, C Di Pietrantonj, V Demicheli

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Lancet (London, England), 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05691790 (Empowering Older People's Preventive Care Utilization Through Mental Model Approach and Patient Activation Approach), which is not on this map. Cited by 208 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
208citing papers in PubMed, 14 pooled it
31.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05691790 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Empowering Older People's Preventive Care Utilization Through Mental Model Approach and Patient Activation Approach: a Randomized Control Trial for Promoting Vaccination Uptake

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Hong KongRan2024 to 2025Enrolled270ConditionsHealth CommunicationArmsMMA and patient activation intervention scheme, Control Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

208 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 602 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Vaccines for preventing influenza in the elderly.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Efficacy of pneumococcal vaccination in adults: a meta-analysis.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2009
    Pooled it
  12. Community-acquired pneumonia.BMJ clinical evidence · 2008
    Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2007
    Guideline
  15. Trial
  16. Recombinant Zoster Vaccine Is Efficacious and Safe in Frail Individuals.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2021
    Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

148 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

T JeffersonCochrane Vaccines Field, ASL 20, 15100 Alessandria, Italy. Toj1@aol.com
D Rivetti
A Rivetti
M Rudin
C Di Pietrantonj
V Demicheli
Azienda Sanitaria Locale Alessandria · ITCochrane · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfluenza vaccination of elderly individuals is recommended worldwide. Our aim was to review the evidence of efficacy and effectiveness of influenza vaccines in individuals aged 65 years or older.

methodsWe searched five electronic databases to December, 2004, in any language, for randomised (n=5), cohort (n=49), and case-control (n=10) studies, assessing efficacy against influenza (reduction in laboratory-confirmed cases) or effectiveness against influenza-like illness (reduction in symptomatic cases). We expressed vaccine efficacy or effectiveness as a proportion, using the formula VE=1-relative risk (RR) or VE*=1-odds ratio (OR). We analysed the following outcomes: influenza, influenza-like illness, hospital admissions, complications, and deaths.

findingsIn homes for elderly individuals (with good vaccine match and high viral circulation) the effectiveness of vaccines against influenza-like illness was 23% (95% CI 6-36) and non-significant against influenza (RR 1.04, 0.43-2.51). Well matched vaccines prevented pneumonia (VE 46%, 30-58) and hospital admission (VE 45%, 16-64) for and deaths from influenza or pneumonia (VE 42%, 17-59), and reduced all-cause mortality (VE 60%, 23-79). In elderly individuals living in the community, vaccines were not significantly effective against influenza (RR 0.19, 0.02-2.01), influenza-like illness (RR 1.05, 0.58-1.89), or pneumonia (RR 0.88, 0.64-1.20). Well matched vaccines prevented hospital admission for influenza and pneumonia (VE 26%, 12-38) and all-cause mortality (VE 42%, 24-55). After adjustment for confounders, vaccine performance was improved for admissions to hospital for influenza or pneumonia (VE* 27%, 21-33), respiratory diseases (VE* 22%, 15-28), and cardiac disease (VE* 24%, 18-30), and for all-cause mortality (VE* 47%, 39-54).

interpretationIn long-term care facilities, where vaccination is most effective against complications, the aims of the vaccination campaign are fulfilled, at least in part. However, according to reliable evidence the usefulness of vaccines in the community is modest.

Indexed as

Influenza VaccinesAgedDrug Resistance, ViralHumansInfluenza, HumanTreatment OutcomeInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID16198765
OpenAlexW2098832466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.